Page 2 of 3

Re: Essex Lad

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:32 am
by Sam Slater
How can you pay an MP, who's been democratically elected and is a spokesperson for tens of thousands be paid less than a regional manager of Tescos or Carphone Warehouse?


Re: Our MP's are underpaid .. Says so ...

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:36 am
by Sam Slater
[quote]Your idea wouldn't work - a London MP (in your world) would be paid ?120,000 with no exes so they would have no need to pay for two homes and their only travel would be on an Oystercard. They would end up with quite a lot of the ?120k after tax.

On the other hand Gameshow Charlie Kennedy would be paid ?120,000 and have to pay ?20,000 or so each year travelling between Westminster and his constituency plus find somewhere to stay while in London all out of his own pocket.[/quote]

There should be some sort of Halls of Residence for MPs to set up an office and living accommodation for MPs who live outside London. As for travel.....tough. I've just doubled their wages and lots of people commute in and out of London everyday at their own expense.


Re: Essex Lad

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 1:08 pm
by David Johnson
"I didn't say that they should have their pay cut. I said that they should get paid the average wage plus 10% in the first place"

Ah yes, an entertaining argument. You say to a group of 650 workers who currently get ?65K a year approx. we only need say, 300 of you.

We will pay you average wage +10% i.e. about ?28K. This is not a pay cut in case any of you think that.

Over to you, to explain how this is not a pay cut.

Re: Our MP's are underpaid .. Says so ...

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:29 pm
by Essex Lad
Sam Slater wrote:

> [quote]Your idea wouldn't work - a London MP (in your world)
> would be paid ?120,000 with no exes so they would have no need
> to pay for two homes and their only travel would be on an
> Oystercard. They would end up with quite a lot of the ?120k
> after tax.
>
> On the other hand Gameshow Charlie Kennedy would be paid
> ?120,000 and have to pay ?20,000 or so each year travelling
> between Westminster and his constituency plus find somewhere to
> stay while in London all out of his own pocket.[/quote]
>
> There should be some sort of Halls of Residence for MPs to set
> up an office and living accommodation for MPs who live outside
> London. As for travel.....tough. I've just doubled their wages
> and lots of people commute in and out of London everyday at
> their own expense.
>
>

Yes lots of people commute in and out of London everyday at their own expense ? me for one. But I go in from Essex not from the Outer Hebrides.

How many MPs from north of Watford would either attend the Commons or visit their constituency regularly if they had to pay ?200+ a time for travel?

Re: Essex Lad

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:34 pm
by Essex Lad
Sam Slater wrote:

> How can you pay an MP, who's been democratically elected and is
> a spokesperson for tens of thousands be paid less than a
> regional manager of Tescos or Carphone Warehouse?
>
>

Because the regional manager of Tescos or Carphone Warehouse are more socially beneficial than MPs.

And MPs are not spokesmen for tens of thousands ? most of them are not even elected by a majority of their constituency and many of those who not share the views of the MP anyway...

Re: Essex Lad

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:16 pm
by Essex Lad
David Johnson wrote:

> "I didn't say that they should have their pay cut. I said that
> they should get paid the average wage plus 10% in the first
> place"
>
> Ah yes, an entertaining argument. You say to a group of 650
> workers who currently get ?65K a year approx. we only need say,
> 300 of you.
>
> We will pay you average wage +10% i.e. about ?28K. This is not
> a pay cut in case any of you think that.
>
> Over to you, to explain how this is not a pay cut.

It is not a pay cut in the same way that Gordon Brown spoke of Tory cuts (I think that was the word he used) and Labour investment...

Re: Our MP's are underpaid .. Says so ...

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:07 am
by milton
At the last General Election the electorate (who turned out) decided that it wanted none of the main parties in power. Yet we have all of the excesses of Tory greed and malice.

In the scandalously mal-conducted PCC elections only 12% turned out. Any democratic system with any integrity would have declared the result void and either binned the policy or started again. Instead in most areas a body of 20 representatives were replaced by one with 20x the power!

This so called democracy is dysfunctional and it is the political classes who are responsible for the dysfunction. Election campaigns are a monstrous deception with all parties lying through their teeth to get their grubby hands on the power in order to bend the Law the State and the Economy in their favour.

A pay rise??!! They should be put to the F***ing guillotine!!


Re: Our MP's are underpaid .. Says so ...

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:28 pm
by Sam Slater
I've just nearly doubled their wages with my idea, which more than compensates for the travel. Yes, some will have to pay more in travel than others but that's the same for many jobs.......and the further out of London the cheaper the way of living (not by much these days but still) which goes partly towards compensating for the extra travel costs.


Re: Our MP's are underpaid .. Says so ...

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:54 pm
by Essex Lad
Sam Slater wrote:

> I've just nearly doubled their wages with my idea, which more
> than compensates for the travel. Yes, some will have to pay
> more in travel than others but that's the same for many
> jobs.......
Not really ? how many of your colleagues commute 200-300 miles each day?

Re: Our MP's are underpaid .. Says so ...

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:24 am
by Sam Slater
How many of my colleagues are on ?120,000pa with a great pension?