Page 2 of 5
How many West Indian cricketers
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:43 pm
by derrick76
have you ever heard racially abuse a white player?
So from what I'm reading
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:53 pm
by derrick76
...the black lawyers (or whomever are the reps) are cunts and bastards etc etc.
And that black (and other) players should put up with racial abuse since they get paid plenty money. Ok, so only poor blacks (and others) should be able to complain about racial abuse.
Got it.
Personally, I'd prefer to shoot a racist dead in the face with sawed off, or apply my cutlass across his neck, but I've got to do things the civilised way....so can't be doing that. Flashbacks to that movie A Rage in Harlem: "You picked the wrong n*** to call a n***!"
Even stepping in his face may result in me getting thrown in jail and him singing like a canary so as to have the maximum thrown at me. So what's left.
Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:14 pm
by Flat_Eric
Like I said Derrick, I could take being called a "white cunt" for 100 grand a week. Come to think of it, I've been called FAR worse things in my time for a LOT less !laugh!.
But sticks & stones and all that. Anyway why is being called a "black bastard" any worse than being called a "fat cunt" or a "ginger twat"?
Are you of the "black people can't be racist" school?
- Eric
Re: So from what I'm reading
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:16 pm
by Flat_Eric
derrick76 wrote:
> Personally, I'd prefer to shoot a racist dead in the face with
> sawed off, or apply my cutlass across his neck
How very liberal-minded of you! A very "progressive" attitude I must say!
- Eric
Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:36 pm
by Flat_Eric
You'll be demanding the death penalty be restored for murderers next !laugh! !laugh!
- Eric
Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:23 pm
by Sam Slater
[quote]But sticks & stones and all that. Anyway why is being called a "black bastard" any worse than being called a "fat cunt" or a "ginger twat"?[/quote]
Because we don't have a historical culture of 'fat cunt lynchings' and 'ginger slaves'?
Fuck's sake......
Re: How many West Indian cricketers
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:47 pm
by Arginald Valleywater
Stacks mate. Sledging is brutal. Ask Glen McGrath who was getting stuff about his late wife from opposing players. Remember Honky means Pig, it is not a compliment.
Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:25 pm
by Flat_Eric
>>
Ah, ok. It's a "historical guilt" thing.
I'll go and don me hair shirt then ....
- Eric
Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:27 pm
by Flat_Eric
Sam Slater wrote:
> Because we don't have a historical culture of 'fat cunt
> lynchings' and 'ginger slaves'?
The point is Sam that these utterances are probably no less "offensive" to you if you're fat or ginger.
Or (God forbid) fat AND ginger.
- Eric
Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:40 pm
by Flat_Eric
Not to mention that black people have quite a colourful history of enslaving and lynching each other as well, and that it's still ongoing in some corners of Africa.