Page 2 of 2
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:46 am
by m100
so supposedly those girls who later say they 'regret' making porn have nothing to 'regret' if they did it with their partner at the time as it wasn't 'really' porn. Someone should tell the daily mail etc this.
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:58 am
by Porn Baron
Thats right
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:54 am
by Grendel1
Also bollocks, they've done it for money for the enjoyment of others. If claiming it's not porn makes them feel better, then that's up to them, but sorry, it is.
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:05 am
by jimslip
The point that is being missed is that it is not us who decide what is, "Pornographic". It is for those in wider society to decide. Pornography is very subjective, so to a Muslim radical, just showing some thigh would be pornographic, whereas to a wife beater or sadist, anything short of murder would be moaned about as being, "Too soft!" I think the definition of pornography changes from decade to decade and at the moment society is becoming less tolerant than perhaps they were 10 years ago. All we do is react and modify our work to what society will tolerate at any one time.
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:53 pm
by m100
But as a general rule if it would be likely to be beneath the headline "Ban this vile filth from our street" on the front of the daily mail then yes, it's porn.
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:18 pm
by Arginald Valleywater
Of course no Daily Mail reader has any children as that would involve some sexual activity....that means they will be extinct before long as most are over 60 and living in Dorset.
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:43 pm
by frankthring
Jim Slip puts it very well indeed....`nuff said....though I like your comment
too, Arginald.
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:49 am
by one eyed jack
Porn Baron wrote
Two partners making love on film is more Mills and Boon than porn. Porn is something seedy.
Is that the limitation of your thoughts on couples porn???
You aint seen the drama thats kicked off in recent months with certain couples I dare not name
You obviously havent seen the tiger in Brook Logan when she snaps at her fella who tries to get "Rocco" on her and his ego is so deflated he thinks about chucking it all in
I'm all anxious on the day shooting couples. I never know what I'm going to get. These are real living people with emotions and thoughts and you could get two different shoots on two different days
If they got too saccharine Ive been known to say"Pass the insulin please" or "please....Im' a diabetic"
You'd be surprised how varied on the same theme of couples that couples can be PB
If it was all Mills & Boon I'd be bored to tears by now !laugh!
I wont even mention the model who stopped a shoot the firtst time and threw her fella out after punching him in the face.
I thought I would get her fella out there before he stopped being the nice guy or it was going to get hectic all round for me.
I can see why many producers do not like working with couples. I relish it because its not just porn. Its a lot more interesting than that
Re: What is considered porn these days?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:47 pm
by Porn Baron
Yes I understand that you enjoy your work but I don't find two people in a relationship having sex on film much of a turn on. I can do that myself and make my own lovey dovey kissy kissy with mrs porn baron. !boring!
I'm sure women prefer your stuff and you get much more content because of it? I'm not knocking it as we are all different and have different tastes.