A few misconceptions from the more gullible
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:57 pm
As expected the usual suspect gets totally confused.
1. Lets examine the qoute from the MD.
Molly Prince, managing director of Close Protection UK, said in a statement: "We take the welfare of our staff and apprentices very seriously indeed. "The staff travelling to the jubilee are completing their training and being assessed on the job for NVQ Level 2 in spectator safety after having completed all the knowledge requirements in the classroom and some previous work experience. It is essential that they are assessed in a live work environment in order to complete their chosen qualifications. "The nature of festival and event work is such that we often travel sleeping on coaches through the night with an early morning pre-event start ? it is the nature of the business ? It's hard work and not for the faint-hearted."
THere are some who support her line that it was just a "logistics" error. What those deluded individuals need to understand was that the actual plan was to drive through the night, arrive at London Bridge at 5am when the rest of the team would arrive and the 14hr shift would start, much of it in the pouring rain. Because the bus arrived early, the workers were told to go under the Bridge. By the time they got to a campsite in Essex at the end of their 14 hr shift unless they were good at sleeping on buses it would be close to 24 hours without sleep for no pay.
For those on work placement there was zero payment for this experience. For those on an "apprenticeship" apparently it was ?2.80 an hour. It was described as a "tryout" for potential work later. There was no copper bottomed promise of a job coming out of this - not even for the Olympics.
What would those people working in the porn industry think of an unpaid tryout in a b/g session to check whether a young Hungarian girl was up to the job or not? My guess is that they would consider that person a slimy, exploitative individual, wouldn't you? Maybe there are people on this forum who would believe that scenario of a free fuck to be entirely acceptable?
2. WHo is Molly Prince?
Well according to this link she has a very, chequered business history.
http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/06/c ... truck-off/
And here is an interview with Molly Prince.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/ne ... 726250.stm
A good day to one and all.
1. Lets examine the qoute from the MD.
Molly Prince, managing director of Close Protection UK, said in a statement: "We take the welfare of our staff and apprentices very seriously indeed. "The staff travelling to the jubilee are completing their training and being assessed on the job for NVQ Level 2 in spectator safety after having completed all the knowledge requirements in the classroom and some previous work experience. It is essential that they are assessed in a live work environment in order to complete their chosen qualifications. "The nature of festival and event work is such that we often travel sleeping on coaches through the night with an early morning pre-event start ? it is the nature of the business ? It's hard work and not for the faint-hearted."
THere are some who support her line that it was just a "logistics" error. What those deluded individuals need to understand was that the actual plan was to drive through the night, arrive at London Bridge at 5am when the rest of the team would arrive and the 14hr shift would start, much of it in the pouring rain. Because the bus arrived early, the workers were told to go under the Bridge. By the time they got to a campsite in Essex at the end of their 14 hr shift unless they were good at sleeping on buses it would be close to 24 hours without sleep for no pay.
For those on work placement there was zero payment for this experience. For those on an "apprenticeship" apparently it was ?2.80 an hour. It was described as a "tryout" for potential work later. There was no copper bottomed promise of a job coming out of this - not even for the Olympics.
What would those people working in the porn industry think of an unpaid tryout in a b/g session to check whether a young Hungarian girl was up to the job or not? My guess is that they would consider that person a slimy, exploitative individual, wouldn't you? Maybe there are people on this forum who would believe that scenario of a free fuck to be entirely acceptable?
2. WHo is Molly Prince?
Well according to this link she has a very, chequered business history.
http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/06/c ... truck-off/
And here is an interview with Molly Prince.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/ne ... 726250.stm
A good day to one and all.