Page 2 of 5

A few misconceptions from the more gullible

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:57 pm
by David Johnson
As expected the usual suspect gets totally confused.

1. Lets examine the qoute from the MD.
Molly Prince, managing director of Close Protection UK, said in a statement: "We take the welfare of our staff and apprentices very seriously indeed. "The staff travelling to the jubilee are completing their training and being assessed on the job for NVQ Level 2 in spectator safety after having completed all the knowledge requirements in the classroom and some previous work experience. It is essential that they are assessed in a live work environment in order to complete their chosen qualifications. "The nature of festival and event work is such that we often travel sleeping on coaches through the night with an early morning pre-event start ? it is the nature of the business ? It's hard work and not for the faint-hearted."

THere are some who support her line that it was just a "logistics" error. What those deluded individuals need to understand was that the actual plan was to drive through the night, arrive at London Bridge at 5am when the rest of the team would arrive and the 14hr shift would start, much of it in the pouring rain. Because the bus arrived early, the workers were told to go under the Bridge. By the time they got to a campsite in Essex at the end of their 14 hr shift unless they were good at sleeping on buses it would be close to 24 hours without sleep for no pay.

For those on work placement there was zero payment for this experience. For those on an "apprenticeship" apparently it was ?2.80 an hour. It was described as a "tryout" for potential work later. There was no copper bottomed promise of a job coming out of this - not even for the Olympics.

What would those people working in the porn industry think of an unpaid tryout in a b/g session to check whether a young Hungarian girl was up to the job or not? My guess is that they would consider that person a slimy, exploitative individual, wouldn't you? Maybe there are people on this forum who would believe that scenario of a free fuck to be entirely acceptable?

2. WHo is Molly Prince?
Well according to this link she has a very, chequered business history.

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/06/c ... truck-off/

And here is an interview with Molly Prince.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/ne ... 726250.stm

A good day to one and all.


Oops wrong place in the thread

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:59 pm
by David Johnson
Meant to have the post with the subject A few misconceptions.....
linked in to my initial post.
Sorry!

Lizard

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:04 pm
by David Johnson
Did he get paid for fucking Tracey? Bloody hell, how can I apply?

Re: Get an unpaid job, you scrounger!

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:26 pm
by Dick Moby
Since you seem to know so much about hard work could you please enlighten us with your work history ------ both past and present.

Re: A few misconceptions from the more gullible

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:03 pm
by Porn Baron
Don't worry it was a one off.

I heard a local politician say that they gained much more than money can buy. They got work experience.!sadbanana!


Porn Baron

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:15 pm
by David Johnson
"I heard a local politician say that they gained much more than money can buy. They got work experience."

Yes. I find money can be ..........so overrated.

Mind, the people who usually think this, have loads of the stuff. Their views are not necessarily shared by those who are trying to get a quick bit of shut-eye under London Bridge.

Apparently the new thing is companies who you pay money to to find you an unpaid job, like an intern, say.

All this "tryout" stuff for nowt seems a relatively recent i.e. last 10 years development.

Some of the jobs I ended up doing for awhile, together with any "unpaid tryout requirements".

1. Cleaning cars. Nope.
2. Postie. Nope.
3. Brickie's labourer. Nope.
4. Working on a car production line. Nope.
5. Being a linen houseman. Nope.

Maybe my natural talent just shone through!

Re: Lizard

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:03 pm
by Lizard
Not even you are that desperate, have you seen Tracey, she probably thought her boat had come in (well, Tug)


Re: Lizard

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:30 pm
by David Johnson
"Not even you are that desperate,"

Hey, you are the one with the very small, scaly penis!

Re: The stench of New Labour envy?

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:34 pm
by jimslip
Can I detect the predictable stench of New Labour jealousy, No6? One rule for the stinking rich bastards that run your party and another for the rest of us. What about that cunt Blair you so adore, does that murdering warmonger "Deserve" to earn ?millions and is he more deserving than me? After all, I don't rain bombs down on innocent people and don't forget your beloved Lord Prescott is soaked in the blood of Blair's victims, after all he egged him on!

Your beloved idols of New Labour, are a bigger bunch of crooked, sleazy bastards than ANYONE of us on BGAFD could ever hope to be, we are all but mere amateurs in the art of "cuntishness" in comparison! If we all attended a 6 year Open University BA in "Blatant Cuntishness" we could never achieve the heady heights of that "art" that your New Labour reached and went beyond! They were masters of sleaze and crookedness!

Now put that in your pipe and smoke it!!happy!


Jimslip

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:42 pm
by David Johnson
!clown! !clown! !clown! !clown!