egafd.com

New labour (1997) said in their ten point plan that they were going to clean up politics, decentralise political power throughout the United Kingdom and put the funding of political parties on a proper and accountable basis.

15 years later nothing has changed! Sick of all these money grabbing useless cunts.

Would you care to speculate with regard to the cost of these prosecutions ? How many millions ?

Correct me if I am wrong, Jimbo but wasn't this labour-watch site, the site put together by David Icke?

Icke was a well-known BBC television sports presenter and spokesman for the Green Party, when in 1990 a psychic told him he was a healer who had been placed on Earth for a purpose, and that the spirit world was going to pass messages to him so he could educate others. In March 1991 he held a press conference to announce that he was a "Son of the Godhead".

Well whatever you think about Blair and Brown at least they never as far as I know, confused themselves with Jesus Christ.

Anyway in the spirit of co-operation, I have an additional Tony Blair sleaze story that you can get added to the labour-watch site.

At first, Tony Blair was against a network block which would result in everyone having to opt in if they wanted to watch porn. Then he changed his mind and was in favour of this attack on civil liberties because he could see there was money in it for him. That's sleazy isn't it?

Oh, bloody hell, I have got confused. It wasn't Tony Blair, it was you, Jimbo who was against infringements on civil liberty but changed your mind on this one could you see it would give you a competitive advantage.

Why do Rebekah and Charlie Brooks have so much access to the media to air their opinions on the fairness or otherwise of the prosecution ?

Secondly, why did the CPS call a press conference to announce and outline charges ?

Who knows, like the Levison enquiry, it's just jobs for the boy's, but you can bet millions of pounds of taxpayers money will be paid to blood-sucking Judges and Barrister's, let's face it the CPS doesn't have a great record, and at the end of the day, how does it affect the ordinary person in the street. The CPS will spend a great deal of money trying to convict all or some of the above, my guess is that they will fail.

You'll need a special Spandau type wing for VP Tonee Blair aka war criminal number one. How many dead on his hands? The coalition maybe doing a kack job of sorting out the country but at least they haven't started any illegal wars and murdered countless thousands of "collateral damage" Iraqis and Afghanistanis. Muslim fundamentalism was legitimised by Blair and his CIA paymasters. Still America's arms industry has plenty of orders.

Jonone wrote:


> Secondly, why did the CPS call a press conference to announce
> and outline charges ?

For transparency is what the CPS said - same as they did with Chris Huhne.

Lizard (nearly) wrote:

> Who knows? Like the Leveson Inquiry, it's just jobs for the
> boys, but you can bet millions of pounds of taxpayers' money
> will be paid to blood-sucking judges and barristers. Let's
> face it, the CPS doesn't have a great record, and, at the end of
> the day, how does it affect the ordinary person in the street?
> The CPS will spend a great deal of money trying to convict all
> or some of the above. My guess is that they will fail.
>
>

I wouldn't be so sure. 'Arry got away with it because no jury was going to find in favour of the Inland Revenue against a "people's hero". Tabloid journalists are right down there with estate agents and MPs and look what happened to some of the latter group. I'm not sure Mrs Brooks won't be seeing the inside of a prison cell before very long...

And 99.9% of prosecutions don't affect the person in the street - that doesn't mean that they should not go ahead.

Essex Lad wrote:

I'm not sure Mrs Brooks won't be seeing the
> inside of a prison cell before very long...


She shouldn't worry, as she's told us many times in the papers, they're basically just holiday camps anyway....

Essex boy (almost) wrote :
" >>I wouldn't be so sure. 'Arry got away with it because no jury was going to find in favour of the Inland Revenue against a "people's hero". Tabloid journalists are right down there with estate agents and MPs and look what happened to some of the latter group. I'm not sure Mrs Brooks won't be seeing the inside of a prison cell before very long..."

You obviously don't know the difference between a chief executive and a tabloid Journalist.None of the accused are journalist.