Page 2 of 5
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:07 am
by eroticartist
"I sometimes wonder why no one has maintained that the giraffe has, in reality, a short neck. If you observe a giraffe drinking or, as they occasionally do, grazing close to the ground, then you know what I mean"
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:35 am
by JamesW
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:38 am
by JamesW
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:45 am
by JamesW
eroticartist wrote:
> So you are saying that short necked giraffes definitely
> existed?
Yes they definitely existed. The earliest short necked giraffe was the climacoceras about 8 million years ago.
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:28 am
by eroticartist
Rather a tall story!
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:33 am
by eroticartist
This creature is nothing like a giraffe!
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:56 pm
by andy at handiwork
But for its short neck ( it is after all a short necked giraffe) it certainly does look like said creature.
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:00 am
by JamesW
andy at handiwork wrote:
> But for its short neck ( it is after all a short necked
> giraffe) it certainly does look like said creature.
Yes, it's almost identical. Modern giraffes have a longer neck and also longer legs, but are otherwise virtually unchanged from the proto-giraffes that lived millions of years ago.
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:34 am
by eroticartist
It is not a giraffe no matter what Darwinists call it...I would say that it is a type of goat!
Re: Darwin and Evolution
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:44 am
by eroticartist
Go to Specsavers and get your eyes tested. It's nothing like a modern giraffe could be horselike, zebra or goat...
Darwinist propaganda but words do not alter an image.