I Pornographer

[Essex Lad]

Funny how companies rarely follow their own rules:

Amazon say:
Content Guidelines

Your books and other content (such as book titles, cover art and product descriptions) must adhere to these content guidelines. We reserve the right to make judgments about whether or not content is appropriate and to choose not to offer it. We may also terminate your participation in the KDP program if you don?t adhere to these content guidelines.

Pornography
We don?t accept pornography

Yet they have a book called, I Pornographer

[one eyed jack]

Thats because there is no salacious porn picture on the cover and nor does the book (so far) go into lurid porn descriptions.

And no Dick, I'm not on a cut of Mikes book.

Is there a problem with passing a favourable comment on anything these days wihtout being accused of having a hidden agenda? Or is being unsupportive and offensive the norm these days?

[one eyed jack]

Essex Lad wrote:

Pornography
We don?t accept pornography

Ah but the book can be about pornography without it being pornographic if it is about the memoirs of the author who wrote it.

In that case would they not allow the sale of Lolita or Lady Chatterleys Lover? There is a difference

[Dick Moby]

I'm not having a pop at you. I just find it strange that when a model posts on here she's told that she has been removed to the Promotions Forum.
Why one rule for some and another for others ?
I suppose that's at the mods discretion.

[one eyed jack]

...Or an oversight on their part.

Maybe?

[eroticartist]

You might learn something about the history of censorship if you read I Pornographer...

[eroticartist]

Thanks Jack,
And also enjoy a good read.
Mike

[eroticartist]

He's not but you should be!

[eroticartist]

You are obviously ignorant of the fact that a book about pornography does have to be pornography per se.

[eroticartist]

Jack,
I won't disappoint you:there are many explicit descriptions of sex in the book as well as corruption and injustice...