Lets hear it for rioter alexis bailey
Re: Lets hear it for rioter alexis bailey
Is the lamp post OK ?
Re: Rodders
I was refering to ytour last lines, not the one about the bastard being a dickhead.
RoddersUK
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Charles
As usual Charles you totally miss the point. The meaning of "legal" is clear to both of us.
The point is about tax avoiders with their snouts in the trough. MPs with their snouts in the trough although much of what they did was "legal" Tax evaders with their snouts n the troughts. So the haves have their snouts in the trough in the case of tax avoiders and tax evaders to the tune of many, many billions. These are the people in terms of tax avoiders and tax evaders who avoid criticism almost completely.
Those who are either unemployed or PAYE dont have that luxury to fiddle the tax and get a pile of shit poured on them daily.
Thats it.
D
The point is about tax avoiders with their snouts in the trough. MPs with their snouts in the trough although much of what they did was "legal" Tax evaders with their snouts n the troughts. So the haves have their snouts in the trough in the case of tax avoiders and tax evaders to the tune of many, many billions. These are the people in terms of tax avoiders and tax evaders who avoid criticism almost completely.
Those who are either unemployed or PAYE dont have that luxury to fiddle the tax and get a pile of shit poured on them daily.
Thats it.
D
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Rodders
Probably a good idea to read the entire message to understand it.
Otherwise you end up making yourself look very, very stupid, accusing me of stating that it is not Bailey's fault when I have already said his actions are inexcusable in the very first sentence of the post.
Cheers
D
Otherwise you end up making yourself look very, very stupid, accusing me of stating that it is not Bailey's fault when I have already said his actions are inexcusable in the very first sentence of the post.
Cheers
D