Page 2 of 2

Re: Predictions for the phone hacking scandal?

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:12 pm
by Flat_Eric
Sounds like you've been watching too much "Batman", David, and are getting a bit carried away bringing it with you onto the forum.

I'm more of a "Green Hornet" man myself. The "Man from UNCLE" was always and enjoyable watch as well. And let's not forget "Mission Impossible".

- Eric


Re: Flat Eric

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:36 am
by David Johnson
Can't answer the question then.

Still waiting with bated breath for the explanation of what a "metrosexual" is, Eric

By the way, have you still not mastered threads? Maybe you could find out how they work before muttering on about Batman.

Cheers
D

How threads work, Eric

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:50 am
by David Johnson
You select the message you want to respond to. Once it is highlighted, your reply is indented so that it is obvious which message you are replying to.

Simples!

Give it a go why don't ya.

Re: Predictions for the phone hacking scandal?

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:13 am
by Flat_Eric
I *can* answer any question you care to put to me David. !teacher!

Whether I *can be arsed* is a different matter though! !boring!

Oh and I'd have thought it was blindingly obvious to even the most slow-witted reader who & what I was replying to without the need to indent quotes! So my apologies if I confused you.

I'll try and remember to spoon-feed you next time !laugh!.

- Eric


Re: Predictions for the phone hacking scandal?

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:27 am
by Flat_Eric
Oh and David - seeing as you bring up the subject of how things work on here, if you're going to level charges of metrosexualitarianism (or any other -ism for that matter) at a fellow forumite, it's good form to explain what exactly it is you mean and why you're levelling said charges.

Not to turn it around and ask *them* to explain to you what it is you mean!

At best that leaves you open to counter-charges of prevarication, and at worst it just makes you look a tad silly.

Just a tip.

- Eric

Eric let's not beat about the bush

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:03 am
by David Johnson
Eric

"Oh and David - seeing as you bring up the subject of how things work on here, if you're going to level charges of metrosexualitarianism (or any other -ism for that matter) at a fellow forumite, it's good form to explain what exactly it is you mean and why you're levelling said charges."

"Good form". Don't make me laugh!

You seem incredibly slow on the uptake, so let me explain it to you. I am just teasing you about being an effeminate metrosexual. No need to worry. I haven't found out any of your secrets!

It's called "turning the tables".

You know why I am teasing you about that, don't you Eric? And you know the context when I say "turning the tables", don't you Eric?

If you want to be humiliated, just carry on expressing ignorance.

Cheers
D

PS Do try to get the hang of threads. It does help.

Re: Predictions for the phone hacking scandal?

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:46 am
by Flat_Eric
That's okay David - and I was only teasing you about your liking for camp men in masks and tights!

- Eric

You can go now, Eric

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:45 pm
by David Johnson
I've finished with you now, Eric.

You can run off to another forum and have a slagging off session with your chums about all these horrible "metrosexuals" on the BGAFD who disagree with your views. Those horrid politically correct liberals, in touch with their feminine sides. Those champagne socialist types.

I know you want to to run off there.

And don't forget to slag off sanctimonious bell-ends like Sam Slater. Your chums will be so much kinder to you. Eh? So much more appreciative in their agreement.

Cheers
D

Re: Predictions for the phone hacking scandal?

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:03 pm
by Flat_Eric
!boring! !boring! !boring!