Page 2 of 3

Re: Deano

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:20 am
by Deano!
David Johnson wrote:

(snip)
> "Dave is entertainment."
>
> Thanks for that Deano, I will try to get a gig with Bruce
> Forsyth or Simon Cowell. I can do with the dosh.

Need the dosh? That's only until the 40% of Bin Liner's millions finally turns up - which it surely will.

I didn't realise Forsyth had been knighted! As an Aussie I like the sound of "Sir Bruce".

Charles

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:21 am
by David Johnson
Like I said if I get insulted I tend to respond rather than turn the other cheek which is why I have been giving it to Jimbo with both barrels and he has been getting so worked up. If someone treats me with some respect, I have no problem reciprocating.

I have given Jimbo an alternative here to all this crap. It is up to him to respond.

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=246493&t=246493

Cheers
D


Bigmac

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:05 pm
by David Johnson
Given you have no point to make apparently, there is no discussion for you to withdraw from.

In this post which tells forumites a lot more about yourself than it does about me, you repeat for a second time a libellous accusation about my being a paedophile, a disgusting criminal offence.

I would take care when libelling people re. a criminal offence whether you "withdraw from this discussion forthwith" or not.

D

An alternative

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:32 pm
by David Johnson
"I propose that if you are being harangued on a particular topic and you no longer wish to be cajoled, you apply the following declaration:

"I hereby invoke my fundamental right to "Beg to differ" with your opinion, David Johnson and I now withdraw from this discussion forthwith. This declaration does not prejudice my opinion in any way and I wholeheartedly stand by my own subjective opinion on this topic. It is my right to do so!"

Could I suggest an alternative? Forumites save themselves a bit of keystroking time and take a leaf out of your book i.e. don't reply to the content of an email which in anyway questions your own views.

This would save save time I guess.

Cheers
D

Re: Poisoned poet/Jimbo

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 pm
by poisned_poet
no, i may not be prolific poster, my words were "i used to read these forums a lot" and there lies your problem! you have to try and nit pick everyones words to the letter (or at least try)

Re: Poisoned poet/Jimbo

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:53 am
by David Johnson
Hi
All I can say is if you do not agree with my views, then carry on doing what you say you are doing - not bothering to read my posts.

There is no compulsion to read anybody's posts on this forum.

Nor to agree with them!

Cheers
D

Whoever you are

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:10 pm
by David Johnson
Freedom of speech does not involve trolling around making unsubstantiated libellous accusations of paedophilia.