Page 2 of 5
Re: The battle for Barking
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:46 pm
by davey
This is absolutely typical of the leftwing point of view.if you dont agree with them 100% and try to make objective observations then it is perfectly acceptable to call you a mug or a bastard!boring!
Re: The battle for Barking
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:57 pm
by Lizard
This was a quote during the programme..
"the BNP wants ?everyone who is sitting in this room to be expelled from this country, dropped from an aeroplane, dropped from a helicopter, left in the sea.?
The BNP are now taking legal action against her, just as in the Woolis case, I hope they win.
Re: The battle for Barking
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:16 pm
by max_tranmere
I saw on the News today that the BNP leader Nick Griffin is going to stand for the seat that the disgraced MP Phil Woolas has just been ejected from. No doubt Labour will just import tens of thousands of people from abroad, get them to immediately register to vote, then win the seat that way.
Max
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:19 pm
by David Johnson
Your post seems very juvenile.
If people have the right to vote, politicians the world over like to see them registered to vote, particularly if they think they may get their vote.
You may recall that George Bush didnt run too many election meetings in Alabama and Georgia urging young black people to register to vote.
What happened in Barking is no different in essence with regard to registration for voting and then getting that vote out from any other part of the world with a similar system.
As for Margaret Hodge wearing a headscarf, this is a mark of respect for other people's beliefs e.g. like women not walking into St. Marks with their tits hanging out. What did you expect, Margaret Hodge to wear a pair of Bermudas and sipping a pina colada and her audiience in the mosque to be similarly attired and drinking bitter shandy as a mark of respect to her culture
Cheers
D
Re: The battle for Barking
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:25 pm
by Dick Moby
I agree, but I fail to see exactly why it's acceptable to call somebody a bastard or scum ----- it's still an insult.
Double standards to me.
Lizard
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:26 pm
by David Johnson
"she just played the race hatred card "
Against the BNP, what a vile bastard Margaret Hodge is. How unfair can a person of Jewish origin be?
"To stand on someone's doorstep and tell a husband his wife could be deported, even though the guy's wife was clearly Chinese, and had lived here for years, was nothing short of disgusting. Fear and lies won her campaign. Max is correct, she was disgraceful.."
Work it out for yourself Einstein. The last time I looked at the BNP Constitution it stated that a key aim of the BNP is to take Britain back to its ethnic makeup of pre 1948 ie. before West Indians, Asians, Chinese etc arrived here in any significant numbers. Barnbrook stated in the film that he wanted to take Dagenham back to the 1960's.
Your little reptilian test is to work out how this could be achieved without forced deportations?
CHeers
D
No reptiles were hurt by this post.
Re: Max
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:37 pm
by max_tranmere
Quote: 'You may recall that George Bush didnt run too many election meetings in Alabama and Georgia urging young black people to register to vote.'
And that's just as bad.
---
Quote: 'As for Margaret Hodge wearing a headscarf, this is a mark of respect for other people's beliefs e.g. like women not walking into St. Marks with their tits hanging out. What did you expect, Margaret Hodge to wear a pair of Bermudas and sipping a pina colada and her audiience in the mosque to be similarly attired and drinking bitter shandy as a mark of respect to her culture'
She shouldn't have worn a headscarf. We don't have a policy of women having to do that in public places in the UK so she shouldn't have felt compelled to do it at a meeting that was being attended by people who are into doing that. Your comment about a pair of Bermuda's and sipping a pina colada is just stupid. I would have expected her to dress the same as she would at a political meeting in Westminster or how she would if she was being interviewed in a TV studio. If people are going to feel obliged to dress like the people of another culture who happen to dominate the room they are in then this clearly is the thin end of a ever thicker wedge. Does this mean that non-muslim women who find themselves living in an area of Britain that is becoming more and more Islamified should have to wear headscarfes when they walk down the street?
Re: Max
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:48 pm
by David Johnson
"Quote: 'You may recall that George Bush didnt run too many election meetings in Alabama and Georgia urging young black people to register to vote.'
And that's just as bad."
That is politics the world over, If you more or less know people are not going to vote for you and you have limited time etc etc. you are not going to concentrate on what you view as a lost cause, are you?
"She shouldn't have worn a headscarf. We don't have a policy of women having to do that in public places in the UK so she shouldn't have felt compelled to do it at a meeting that was being attended by people who are into doing that. "
This is just plain stupid, Max and even you can surely see it. We dont have a policy that you cant wander in Westminster Abbey in your swimming trunks but people dress moderately in my experience when they are visiting places of faith. Hodge was speaking at a meeting run by an Imam either in a mosque or in some associated building and she was showing some respect in the same way that Italians would expect people not to dress immoderately when walking in St. Marks.
Why is this so incredibly difficult for you to understand?
CHeers
D
---
Re: The battle for Barking
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:54 pm
by Sam Slater
We all know what davey's been up to while we've had the snow:
[img]
http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20101202/capt. ... dgu.RQOA--[/img]