egafd.com

I prefer the if you've got nothing nice to say then say nothing approach myself.

There has been a huge decline in the standard of porn 'models' for years, as far as I am concerned and I'd even go as far as saying it staggers me that some actually think they can get work but like most it really does depend on what floats floats your boat.

What I find attractive some will go fuck off, she's well fugly and vice versa.

I may think it but wouldn't say god babes, no offence but your a dog who will never or should never get work.

If X doesn't get work then X should know why.

It's different if the 'model' asks for opinions on if they should or could be a model but even in that case a NO is the most that is needed, not a slag off with insults.

Great to see you back posting by the way T

So its ok to slag Cheryl Cole on this forum because she isnt a pornstar but whats the difference she's still a person with feelings, she has probably had to endure more slaggings than any porn model...

I'm really appreciative of virtually any girl that make porn because it's like having a female that's on our side. By 'on our side' I simply mean that the mainstream media carries so much crap about how porn degrades women and that the men who watch it are oppressing women etc. So I tend to be extra forgiving of porno girls who might be a bit too old or really not that hot, because they're doing it for us and because of this, they actually look more attractive to me anyway.

By the way, I think by far the harshest critics of women's appearance are of course, other women. I'm constantly amazed at how brutal women can be in their criticism of other's looks. I guess it helps keep the standards high!

Ah, the spell of pornography. Deano, they're not doing it for you. They're doing it for themselves.

Cheryl Cole doesn't come on here to read it though !wink!

rgb wrote:

> Cheryl Cole doesn't come on here to read it though !wink!
>
planeterotica wrote:

How do you know she dosnt !wink!

It's a case of the mods telling us what they believe is right and wrong. I feel there should be more freedom allowed in the posts.

Yes but its their house we are invited into so its their rules we shall live by so dont be too surprised if you outstay your welcome you could get kicked out.

Yes, true. But it's an open forum. It's a place for talk and debate. As long as it's not advocating harm to other people we should be able to argue and debate the pornography industry. I just think it's a bit hypocritical of the things they let through.

I think most models want to be idolised - that doesn't mean all but most. So I think constructive non derogatory posts should and are acceptable. I mean there's no point posting how you don't like so and so. As bgafd admin have pointed out 'if you haven't got anything nice to post don't post.'

Sure there are some models I don't like the look of but this is the classic case of 'one man's food is another man's poison' and 'whatever floats your boat'. The same goes for photographer's styles of photography. Some are damn right amateur but can be a lot more real and arousing than perfectly composed photos. At the same time well positioned lighting can enhance a model's looks or make her look different to her normal photos.

So constructive criticism is great.... But at the end of a day most of us are posting a teaser of content we want others to buy. Would you go to a Market and be offered a horrible outfit that you don't like or say 'sorry I don't like that.' I'm not trying to directly compare people to outfits but everyone who posts on here as a model, tog or producer are trying to sell something and should accept that not everyone would like their products or services.

Just my opinion,

Ron

andy ide wrote:

> Ah, the spell of pornography. Deano, they're not doing it for
> you. They're doing it for themselves.

Rubbish. Haven't you seen the way Belladonna looks straight down the camera at me in her videos? She's gaggin' for me!