Re: How long until Ireland is reunited?
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:12 am
I am English, and I agree that living in the past and complaining about it is pointless. We might as well blame the Italians for the Roman occupation of Britain. I just find it irksome to constantly view Ireland/Britain through the lens of oppressor/oppressed. It's surprising how little people recognise the Irish contribution to the army that built the Empire. Maybe that's why the whole Easter uprising and response to it leaves such a bitter taste. A few hundred Irishmen took the opportunity to try and cause a revolution when 100,000+ Irishmen were fighting on the western front, and the British response was acceptable for wartime, but as a political act it was insane - especially with the introduction of conscription.
It also bugs me that the incredibly slow aristo-lead political system in England was dragging its feet over the unification which would have rendered the whole Irish/British thing moot (comparatively). Britain's Empire was at a peak of power and prestige before WW1; if they had brought the Irish in as full partners rather than constantly trying to keep them as a 'the first colony' then all of the animosity would exist where it exists with the Scots and the Welsh - and the biggest argument we would've had over the last 30 years would've been devolution.
At least, that's how I see it.
It also bugs me that the incredibly slow aristo-lead political system in England was dragging its feet over the unification which would have rendered the whole Irish/British thing moot (comparatively). Britain's Empire was at a peak of power and prestige before WW1; if they had brought the Irish in as full partners rather than constantly trying to keep them as a 'the first colony' then all of the animosity would exist where it exists with the Scots and the Welsh - and the biggest argument we would've had over the last 30 years would've been devolution.
At least, that's how I see it.