Page 2 of 2

Re: Talladega Nights, the movie...

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:00 am
by max_tranmere
oej, I disagree. As I said several times on my thread about Facebook, that is a place where comments about non-issues are just statements and dont generate chat. On here, on the telephone, or two people talking about a non-issue face to face DOES generate chat. Therefore there is a point to it. On Facebook they are just isolated comments that don't act as the trigger for a dialogue and therefore have no purpose.

Re: Talladega Nights, the movie...

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:14 pm
by welkram
max_tranmere wrote:

> Rambo III was ok to watch, I've not seen the new one, but will
> at some point. Apparently Rambo III had the highest body count
> of any film EVER made! (fact).



I always thought that honour went to Sam Peckinpah's 'THE WILD BUNCH', also the acting was much better.

Re: Talladega Nights, the movie...

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:02 pm
by jj
Comparing 'RIII' with the 'Wild Bunch' is like comparing arse-gravy
with Chateau Laffite : -)


Re: Talladega Nights, the movie...

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:54 pm
by welkram
I fully agree, but was not trying to compare R111 to TWB, we were talking only of body counts.

Re: Talladega Nights, the movie...

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:59 am
by jj
But to be pedantic, just for a moment- "surely not", I hear you
all cry [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/nerd.gif[/img] this is bodies that are actually seen being killed,
yes?
Otherwise, many 'nuclear/pandemic/meteor-strike etc. etc. holocaust'
flicks would have b-cs registering in the millions......