egafd.com

"Ulrika was up for eviction because housemate voted for that. Phone voters (not involved in the selection of those up for eviction) evidently wanted her kept in. It's their votes that count. Simple.

Your claim about Ulrika being kept in because her fee was the highest is also bollocks. Once Channel 4 have paid the fees, it makes no difference to them who is evicted, or when."

Thank you for your explanation, Peter.

I would add that the vote is verified by the Electoral Reform Society, a highly respected and impartial body.

I don't see how the show's producers could fix a vote in those circumstances, unless they were very busy making a lot of calls of course.

I think the professional gambler approad could be interesting. The odds for her to win were so low, it would have paid off to put a BIG bet on and then simply sat dialing her over and over again for 24 hours. Hell get a syndicate on the job, a crappy 48 hours, but a big payout. I must admit i was suprised at her win, but there is one thing all the guys here are missing. The female vote. As a girly watching the show, it got down to 5 girls and just one girl due to male-orientated bully-boy antics and tactical voting. The female population may well have acted against this and supported Ulrika (despite not particularly liking her) simply as a reaction to this. Classic male-female politcs? Well, thats my input on it all. It definately wasn't rigged, there would be way to much controversy. Just think outside the box for an explanation :p xxx

I have never seen this show, but apparently it was a lot more female voters than male voters anyway.

How about a BB Orgy ?