Page 2 of 4
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:41 pm
by Sam Slater
Most Chimps (both sexes) masturbate, and the females are just as promiscuous as the males...sometimes even more so.
All Chimps seem to do is fight, fuck, fart and fool around. We're not related in any way!
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:05 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Yep, and we'll have another 'nutty despot' called Boris carrying on with the job..."
Yes, but Boris is nutty in a benign way. The worst Londoners can expect with him in charge is constantly having to titter at his gloriously un PC outbursts. He'll not be fraternizing with our enemies, like Ken, or spending London's' wealth on street scum, asylum seekers or gay and lezzy action groups (or almost anyone apart from ordinary white, male, Caucasian Londoners). He'll not be frittering away money on loony Orwellian 'Low Emission' zones or insulting rational democratic people with his snidey (but fashionable with middleclass luvvies) anti-Semitism.
No, thankfully I don't live in London (though I do visit quite often). I couldn?t put up with the overcrowding, the rampant political correctness and all that Congestion Charging malarkey.
Officer Dibble
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:41 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Let's hope he's got a solution to the 50% child poverty rate in the capital"
I would suggest stopping penniless third world asylums seekers, who have no first world skills or anything that we can possibly use, from coming here - just put them straight back on the next plane from whence they came. Also, dissuading stupid feckless young chav birds from reproducing might prove enormously beneficial in alleviating child poverty - and a myriad of other social ills.
Officer Dibble
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:02 pm
by jimslip
I can see how in an uncontrolled situation like a drunken party it wouldn't be a major problem, however you only mention bj, not double anal or pussy.
In a porn scene environment, everything is controlled, for camera angles etc, so I think it's much more apparent what you're doing. Also remember the stills!
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:10 pm
by Ace
jimslip wrote:
> I can see how in an uncontrolled situation like a drunken party
> it wouldn't be a major problem, however you only mention bj,
> not double anal or pussy.
Who mentioned drunken parties Jim? Not me!
The ones I attended were sober because of the drive home.
If we had to go 'twos up' in a hole, chances are we would have as well
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:56 pm
by Pervert
Call it a fault, but I am interested in women when I watch porn. How many organs she can introduce into her body at once is not something that interests me.
There is a name for those more interested in the male member than the female body.
Sorry if someone has already said all this.
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:13 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Amazing it's all down to class and race as usual. Even Boris hasn't tried that tack...."
I mentioned neither class nor race - just the stupid, the feckless, the unskilled and those of modest, if any, means. Those qualities are not always synonymous with class or race.
Officer Dibble
Re: Questionaire re: multi-dick penetration.
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:26 am
by Bob Singleton
I'm not at all interested in watching a girl take two cocks in the same hole (which hole really doesn't matter) nor am I overly interested in more standard DPs (one in the pussy and one in the arse) One every now and then is OK, but no more.
I played rugby at a reasonably high level for about 12/13 years (all spent in the scrum!) and am not homophobic, but I do have my doubts about guys who don't mind rubbing their cocks against each other... even if they are in a girl's pussy/mouth/arse at the time.
I'm with Caractacus on this one... I'm far more interested in the female body than the male member. I find close-ups of a cock pumping in and out of a pussy tedious, much preferring wider angle shots... the fact that these close-ups make up a large percentage of the scene means that very little porn made today is to my liking.
Too many DPs
Too many extreme close-ups
Too many anal gapes
Too much abuse bordering on misogeny