Page 2 of 2

Re: big brother

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:19 am
by Jacques
That is the Dutch Version - 'The Big Donor Show'


Re: big brother

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:20 am
by Ace
Run by Endermol, the same company that does BB*

*Big Brother, NOT Beeston Boy


Re: big brother

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:22 am
by steve56
sounds like a headache tablet.Ace wrote:

> Run by Endermol, the same company that does BB*
>
> *Big Brother, NOT Beeston Boy
>
>

Re: big brother

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:38 am
by ATS
Trumpton wrote:

> Bloody hell, here we go again with the annual televisual freak
> show!!!
>
> I've never understood what all the fuss is about this pile of
> shite!!
>
> Why are the tabloids totally awe-struck by this vomit inducing
> bag of excrement!!! Nothing was going to prevent them from
> giving this front page billing today.

This is what pisses me off most about this show - we all have an off
button or a free choice whether we watch BB or not. But why do the
tabloids give it so much coverage?

If they were as outraged at channel 4 as they made out during the celeb
version, why do they now devote so much time to the new series.

If they believed in all they printed a few months ago then they would have
snubbed this latest offering. But no the hypocrites give it page after page
of coverage and will be opening their cheque books to anybody who can
dish the dirt on anyone they know in the house

Re: big brother

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:26 pm
by crofter
Maybe because it sells papers?? Sad but most probably true.