Page 2 of 5

Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:43 am
by eroticartist
Alice,

I have two relations in the Metropolitan police force and I know that some of them are incorruptible and good coppers but there are others who are are not. If you come up against the corrupt ones you will discover that they will do anything to secure a conviction or earn some filthy lucre in a brown paper envelope.

Actually I am very interested in law enforcement and believe that the Met should get out of their cars and onto bikes, mix with the local community and make every attempt to prevent crime. The crime rate would come right down if the police abandoned the their conviction/promotion system. Instead of promotion going to those officers who nicked most people it should go to those with the lowest crime rates on their patch. In other words those who prevented crime.

Wages should be on par with MPs for the top ranks and the lowest ranks should earn much higher wages. They are doing a dangerous and difficult job and more publicity should be given to the heroes and those keeping down crime on their patches.

It is an enormous task to weed out the bad apples but I know that there are those willing to do it if they had the means. What is needed is a powerful anti corruption squad with its men working undercover.

Mike Freeman.

Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:49 am
by eroticartist
Zigzug,
Nazi scum!!adolf!
Mike Freeman.
Http://eroticartist.co.uk


Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:30 am
by Sam Slater
[quote]Instead of promotion going to those officers who nicked most people it should go to those with the lowest crime rates on their patch. In other words those who prevented crime.[/quote]

Mike, that's the most sensible thing you've said in a while !happy! I agree with you wholeheartedly.

No access to the wacky stuff in Italy has done you the world of good! !grin!


Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:19 am
by Officer Dibble
From what I?ve seen of Shami Chakrabati the only rights she?s really interested in (apart from gayboys and lezzies) are the rights of those who are trying to destabilise our society and kill us. In short, she is one of the left/liberal middleclass elite and her concerns are those of people like her. But of course these particular issues and concerns are not the same issues that concern ordinary working folks or the majority of British citizens. So I think there might be sufficient justification for us to turn our noses up at her.

If Mike (as a pornographer) thinks that Shami Chakrabati would even care to shake his hand, much less fight for his right to be pervy, he is living in a fairyland of woolly delusion. The Guardian reading chattering classes generally look down on porn people as exploiters and demeanours of ?wimmin? ? sleazy reactionary uncultured people who are probably working class and most certainly not ?on message?. These people are not fashionable or considered cool amongst the middleclass elite. Shit, those poncy fuckers would probably prefer Americans to porn folk! To them porn people are ?non-people? to be ignored or sneered at whenever their ilk are mentioned in public. If you want to curry favour amongst the chattering classes you have to be a terrorist, a Palestinian (aren?t they the same thing?), a lezzy, gay boy, illegal immigrant, any colour apart from white (but the darker the better) a nutter, smelly bastard, or a waster. If you are not one of these ?minorities? then your rights are unimportant, to the point that they don?t matter. I?m afraid these are the general beliefs and views that hold sway amongst Shami and her pals ? so yes, a slagging off may be well overdue.



Officer Dibble




Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:28 am
by Officer Dibble
"Mike, that's the most sensible thing you've said in a while I agree with you wholeheartedly."

Yes, I initially thought that was a good idea - but then it dawned on me. It would be great for the copper fortunate enough to secure the leafy Wilmslow solicitors beat - not so great for the poor copper who got landed with a shite hole like Hackney! He would end up having to stop by the old soup kitchen on the way home.


Officer Dibble




Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:59 am
by zigsuk
This is exactly what I mean about closing down arguments and attempting to prevent free speech by calling people 'racist' or 'Nazi scum.'

Just because I have no interest in any religion, least of all Islam, just because I resent my taxes going to support illegal immigrants who masquarade as asylum seekers. How many of them are actually turn out to be nothing more than criminals?
Just because I believe it's time the rights of people who have contributed to this economy - many of whom no longer have a voice because they've been intimidated into being frightened to say what they really think by the 'liberal facists' - just because I think it's time their rights were priviliged over the 'rights' of those who do nothing but take, and often don't even display any gratitude for what they have taken.
Just because I don't believe Shami Chakrabarti and her ilk serve any useful purpose in our society you call me Nazi scum.

Methinks it's you who's the fascist, mate.

Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:26 pm
by Sam Slater
True, true.

There should be a rotation system between suburbs. That way no one copper gets the same beat, and doesn't have time to get too friendly with the scum.

The downside is the local populace wouldn't get to build a friendship with the coppers as they'd always be changing.

Still, the current system doesn't seem to be working. Maybe it's worth a thought.


Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:26 pm
by fudgeflaps
Sorry, sorry..........

....I saw the thread title and thought...........

....we so need an edit function.

!wink!


Re: Shami Chakrabarti

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:33 am
by eroticartist
Dibble,

I was a member of NCROPA, affiliated to NCCL, (now Liberty) for years and got to know many of the middle-class people that you so despise True many of them are armchair revolutionaries who when the OPS stuck their foot in their doors became terrified during the time was prosecuted for making two gay films (What a Gay Day and Dial a Guy ) but they truly believed in freedom of speech.

Far from despising working class guys they admired me for being a political activist . It is true that many Guardian readers have formed a negative view of contemporary British pornographers because their work is demeaning to women and misogynist and, although I am anti-censorship, there is a lot of truth in this.

Your homophobic reactionary views are anathema to me although I accept that I am a bit of "a nutter."

Mike Freeman.