Re: From dot com to dot xxx?
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 9:55 pm
I think if porn became too cleaned up and legitimate it would lose some of its appeal in general with a section of its clientele.
Sure some people want to be stimulated by the artistic types of the Ninn/ Blake/ Watson ilk but then there are a hell of a lot who want the seamy gutter filth of some low end productions also.
I can totally understand why the government would shy away and turn a blind eye to this as to accept one level of it is to endorse it in general....Could you really see Bush fielding questions about accepting acts like multi man cum bath and anal tag teams, Max Hardcore and acts such as ass to mouth alongside the pretty sterile images of glamorous soft core like Playboy? I think not.
Sure some people want to be stimulated by the artistic types of the Ninn/ Blake/ Watson ilk but then there are a hell of a lot who want the seamy gutter filth of some low end productions also.
I can totally understand why the government would shy away and turn a blind eye to this as to accept one level of it is to endorse it in general....Could you really see Bush fielding questions about accepting acts like multi man cum bath and anal tag teams, Max Hardcore and acts such as ass to mouth alongside the pretty sterile images of glamorous soft core like Playboy? I think not.