Page 2 of 4
Re: DOCTOR WHO
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:59 am
by Pervert
Liz's role to a tea!
Re: DOCTOR WHO
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:21 am
by rrankin
Re: DOCTOR WHO
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:28 am
by Deuce Bigolo
Just as Holden would be a standout as Toad in 'Turd in the Willows' the much awaited sequel to 'Wind in the Willows'
cheers
B....OZ
Re: DOCTOR WHO
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:17 am
by The Last Word
For a show hoping to attract much overseas sales, a million a show sounds about right, and with Russel T. Davies at the helm, the scripts should pass muster. They've gone for one or two parters episode-wise, a bit like the X-Files used to, and with Piper they may be trying to tap into the Buffy audience.
The shown itself got an excellent write up in yesterday's Sunday Times (though its cultural barometer is frequently haywire). Sadly, at what we now call the front end, the new Doctor Who logo is a complete dud.
Fingers crossed for the end of the month...
Re: DOCTOR WHO
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:26 pm
by Pervert
If ever you needed a Tardis . . . .
There's a bit on the BBC News site saying that the first episode is doing the rounds on the internet---three weeks before it's due to air.
Re: DOCTOR WHO
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:24 pm
by Pervert
For myself, I'd rather wait.
