Page 2 of 3

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 9:43 am
by Seymour Clearly
when he gets to the Us, the fingerprinting and retina scan might prove a bit awkward............

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 9:44 am
by steve56
why dont they just shoot the bloke?

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 9:58 am
by jj
People on benefits DO pay tax, although it is very very little.
Or do you mean he is independently wealthy (I suspect he is an illegitimate royal, or perhaps an exiled Habsburg), and has an EXTREMELY good accountant?

I think it's an excellent plan, to sell off our surplus or otherwise unwanted citizenry to the US, who have proved after Cherry Coke, and 'London Bridge' that they will indeed buy ANYTHING.
Perhaps we could offer them the Government next: after all, they'd fit in perfectly there.

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 10:00 am
by jj
We're not allowed to, Steve.
That's why we have to send him to America, so they can do it.

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 12:48 pm
by steve56
just seen his pic on yahoo,hes the image of mick jagger.

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 1:08 pm
by jj
Who?
Mick Jagger?

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 1:27 pm
by steve56
abu yabboo boo

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 1:28 pm
by Peter
We're not allowed to extradite people to counties if they may face the death penalty over there thanks to the EU, so this scum will never leave this country, but spend the rest of his life spouting his hatered of Britain. (Whilst taking his benefits payments, of course)

Re: abu hamza

Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 2:12 pm
by Peter Woods
Ok, the guy may well be a freeloading racist scumbag but he is a human, isn't he ?

We all know what would (will ?) happen once the Yanks get hold of him.
What sort of signal does that send out to the world ? It suggests to the world that we're all a bunch of hypocrites who "protect" human rights when it suits us but get someone else to do our dirty work when we take a dislike to someone.

Surely, if we (the UK) are really trying to combat international terrorism and he is an international terrorist, he could be tried here ? Whatever your feelings about the man, don't you think he stands a better chance of a fair trial here than in the USA ?