This whole thread is a masterclass in how NOT to promote your website... !disaster!
Lep`s Smutty Website- A new thread.
Re: Load of Rubbish
Fly tipping should be legalised!wink!
-
Welshmorph
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Lep`s Smutty Website- A new thread.
togandlep wrote:
>
You can still find free porn on the internet, but
> this only exists to hook people into buying products or
> services, so it isn`t really free in the long run.
>
Er, yes it is since you are not obliged to buy any "products or services".
>
You can still find free porn on the internet, but
> this only exists to hook people into buying products or
> services, so it isn`t really free in the long run.
>
Er, yes it is since you are not obliged to buy any "products or services".
-
photo_man69
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Lep`s Smutty Website- A new thread.
A website from the 1980's by the look of it, jesus, what a mess !
The trolls are back!
Unfortunately it isn`t really possible to promote a website on this forum. In the short term it beings people to the website but then the trolls spring into action. Their website is better?
The guy who insists free porn is free because you don`t have to buy any products and services is correct in the short term, but in the long run if nobody bought from these sites they would be taken offline. If that is meant to be a justification for password sharing it is not a very strong argument.
The guy who has got round my right click protection (I was warned that this would happen) at least seems to get my sense of humour. 2 of his captions are close to the actual captions in my members area. No harm has been done as he has taken the photos from my preview page, but it is still legally a copyright infringement. I had the photos right click protected after someone posted some images on a forum which caused a serious domestic incident for a model on my site. You can work out who because she is in one of the photographs that has been posted on this thread. This model`s levels and other behaviour exceed her published levels as soon as her partner is out of her sight and it resulted in a very unhappy episode. It is easy to get round the right click protection in my members area and it will be obvious which photographs are contentious, so please be aware that if a member posts these on a forum I would have no alternative than to cancel his membership. The photographs are there for members to view but if they leak out into the public domain again there could be another incident. The model concerned is easily the most naturally gifted I have ever worked with, but unfortunately because of this episode I have had to say that I will not work with her again. It is a shame but this is meant to be a comedy porn website and the incident was not funny.
To the caption writer I say can you beat: "Tori Baynes is such an arse licker..." Next photograph. "...But she saves Nicoletta a fortune on toilet paper." Tori was very brave to put her tongue anywhere near Nicoletta`s huge rear end.
Finally someone thinks this is a 1980s website. Really? With models who are still working today.
Over to you trolls!...
The guy who insists free porn is free because you don`t have to buy any products and services is correct in the short term, but in the long run if nobody bought from these sites they would be taken offline. If that is meant to be a justification for password sharing it is not a very strong argument.
The guy who has got round my right click protection (I was warned that this would happen) at least seems to get my sense of humour. 2 of his captions are close to the actual captions in my members area. No harm has been done as he has taken the photos from my preview page, but it is still legally a copyright infringement. I had the photos right click protected after someone posted some images on a forum which caused a serious domestic incident for a model on my site. You can work out who because she is in one of the photographs that has been posted on this thread. This model`s levels and other behaviour exceed her published levels as soon as her partner is out of her sight and it resulted in a very unhappy episode. It is easy to get round the right click protection in my members area and it will be obvious which photographs are contentious, so please be aware that if a member posts these on a forum I would have no alternative than to cancel his membership. The photographs are there for members to view but if they leak out into the public domain again there could be another incident. The model concerned is easily the most naturally gifted I have ever worked with, but unfortunately because of this episode I have had to say that I will not work with her again. It is a shame but this is meant to be a comedy porn website and the incident was not funny.
To the caption writer I say can you beat: "Tori Baynes is such an arse licker..." Next photograph. "...But she saves Nicoletta a fortune on toilet paper." Tori was very brave to put her tongue anywhere near Nicoletta`s huge rear end.
Finally someone thinks this is a 1980s website. Really? With models who are still working today.
Over to you trolls!...
-
Welshmorph
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: The trolls are back!
If a model performed levels she doesn't normally have published why would you put that picture in your preview pics for anyone to see?
Morph
Morph
[url]http://www.customadultvideos.co.uk[/url]
Re: The trolls are back!
They were taken from my members area.
Re: The trolls are back!
togandlep wrote:
> The guy who insists free porn is free because you don`t have to
> buy any products and services is correct in the short term, but
> in the long run if nobody bought from these sites they would be
> taken offline. If that is meant to be a justification for
> password sharing it is not a very strong argument.
>
It wasn't meant to be a justification for password sharing and I'm not sure my valid point makes me a troll.
As for free content meaning the end of a site, I would point you in the direction of MailOnline ? totally free, income ?41million per year. The Sun ? behind a paywall and income a lot less than ?41million...
> The guy who insists free porn is free because you don`t have to
> buy any products and services is correct in the short term, but
> in the long run if nobody bought from these sites they would be
> taken offline. If that is meant to be a justification for
> password sharing it is not a very strong argument.
>
It wasn't meant to be a justification for password sharing and I'm not sure my valid point makes me a troll.
As for free content meaning the end of a site, I would point you in the direction of MailOnline ? totally free, income ?41million per year. The Sun ? behind a paywall and income a lot less than ?41million...