Page 2 of 2

Re: Lolly Badcock Question

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:19 pm
by jamesr
Mutilated? That's a bit strong mate. Presuming Lolly reads posts about her, I would imagine she might agree that your comment was hurtful and unneccessary. A simple, "I preferred her pre boob job" might have sufficed.


Re: Lolly Badcock Question

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:39 pm
by johnsmith09
Great name, great arse and to top it all of a great smile. Just as well I can't recognize her now.

Re: Lolly Badcock Question

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:02 am
by Deuce Bigolo
If only people didnt have tunnel vision

Even the simplest amongst us can see Lollys appeal has nothing to do with her small breasts

What hits me first with Lolly is her combination of Eyes and hair
The she turns around and you see that ass
Then she delivers dirty talk without a hint of guidance

150 flicks with natural or there abouts

I dont think she looks any worse with the enlarged breasts



I liken what we're talking about to Michelle thorne who once had small natural breasts really early in her modelling career which were never her main attraction...lets be honest...then she had them done and she became a pornstar...a very good dirty talking one just like Lolly


Re: Lolly Badcock Question

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:04 am
by Deuce Bigolo
Your right but I'd assume Lolly and co have learned the end users arent always that discreet and quite frankly they dont my wages so they can think what they like