Page 2 of 6
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:41 am
by Paul Taylor
The humour thing is what I try and do in my scenes,but again depending on the girl it depends what they are like,I've had some crackers over the years who can throw dialogue back and forth always makes a better scene
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:26 am
by planeterotica
The trouble is with a lot of the Gym freaks is they dont have any personality as they become to obsessed with their bodies, Marino always kept himself fit but would still have a laugh with the girls, also a lot of the porn shot todays dosnt contain dialogue apart from the moans and groans of the performers !sad!
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 1:49 pm
by wayne
Super mario funnily enough isnt the kind of bloke i had in mind when typing he had a personlity to begin with! I think i mena those who have little if no personlaity or brains to begin with and by ending up looking like something from a gay mag it makes them a somebody.
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:32 pm
by WillieShafter
Thanks Jo. Yes we do get on rather well lol!! !love! Either we are VERY good actors or the chemistry is really there !wink!
The latter being the truth of course. !grin! About time we did another shoot? All those hits on xHamster certainly say something. !hump2!
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:00 pm
by Jo Juggs
pmsl lol was gonna say my acting crap lol so it is defo the chemistry lol
Love
Jo Juggs
xxx
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:43 am
by kaitaylor
Hi there peeps.
Just want to say I so enjoy having fun on set.
Love a good joke and building a great chemistry with the girls.
Thank you very much Mister C for the compliment.
I hope this industry will appreciate everything I can give to this the viewers and yourself.
Many thank
Kai taylor
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:54 am
by one eyed jack
I'm with what Mr C said.
The ratio of performers with personalities is about the same as it ever was. I agree about theguys that look good deliviering not just luke warm performances but lack that extra thing that gets the best out of a girl.
A lot of producers have moved away from the typeof reality porn that was so prevalent in the 90's and many may think thats a good thing but the fact I'm still around getting emails tells me many long for the good old days.
Time moves on and we do have physically better bodied guys and I'm all for that as the girls need eye candy too.
As a girl once said to me about a stud who shall remain nameless. She absolutely loved fucking the guy because he had a hot body and a big dick but once he was done couldnt stand the guy.
I prefer the area I've moved to now with couples as I really enjoy the chemistry (for better or worse) with them. I mean like the digging and nagging some women do. You wouldnt see this on a pro shoot.
Well you would but many men end up at half mast justwanking their dicks. I cant stand that half hour wank ot pop at the end of pro porn. It drives me nuts. Why dont editors cut that shit down!!!!
Nothing puts me off enjoying a scene watching a girl waiting with her mouth open and getting bored then suddenly looks excited as it comes out. Just looks so formulaic and tired. Dont these guys QC their clips???
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:28 am
by jimslip
"Look at the kind of individuals that used to appear and they now wouldnt get a look in."
You're right, before the launch of Private, you used to get a complete mixture of blokes, most of whom would be considered to be "dog ugly" by todays standards. Private came along and decided that everyone viewing porn was deperate to see oil covered, hairless, body builders, wearing bandanas and wrap around shades, shagging the birds.
I actually think that this kind of stuff completely alienates the viewer, because the scene "Excludes" them. Because in the mind of the viewer when he sees a hot bird doing a hot scene with a tanned body-builder, he says to himself, "Well of course the scene is hot, she's fucking someone she fancies, but she'd vomit all over me if she ever met me. I'll carry on watching, 'cos I want to see the girl getting fucked." Actually, there are many women who ACTUALLY PREFER normal guys to body-builders and ACTUALLY FIND IT MORE IMPORTANT TO RELATE TO A GUY IN TERMS OF HUMOUR THAN JUST THEIR PHYSIQUE! LOL
This is not to say viewers want to see ugly blokes. During the scenes I've shot for TVX of which there are hundreds, I always cast blokes who look like someone
,you'd see in the street. Good looking, but normal. They are much more
believable and enhance the scene. Body builders always look, even unintentionally, as if they are trying to take attention from the girl and any scene I film, the girl is always the centre of attention, all the time. The last thing I want is some dude doing thumbs up to camera and saying, "Phwoar, what a scorcher, git ya knickas orff darlin' " It's just so, "80's! lol
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:01 am
by firefly
Jim
At last someone who talks sence on this topic. I shoot real girls and boys for those who can associate with these people.
Mainly private buyers but some for far east market and business is booming
Re: Are Studs becoming redundant?
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:32 am
by jimslip
OEJ, I once made a series with a well know stud who had to work with dozens of babes (as was the case 7 or 8 years ago) Anyway, I hadn't noticed, but my client had, that the stud looked like, "He was waiting for a bus on a rainy day in Morecombe" all the time. This was during scenes where he was going to plunge his dick into some babe's arse! lol
Quite reasonably, they demanded I boot the guy off the series, which I gladly did. What an insult to the viewer who might never get such an opportunity in all of his life to fuck some babe's arse, to see some oaf yawning and having an expression of, "Oh ok if I must!"
Now I look very carefully to see enthusiasm on studs faces.