egafd.com

The vocal minority of blokes slate girls for their increased appendages. As most posters on hair could only dream of getting close to a pornstar (with or without enhanced boobs) I think there is a touch of ignorant envy attached to some of the comments. Long hair, make-up, decent-sized breasts, shapely legs, skirts....all these things set woman apart from men and the better each one is, the more attractive they are to us (generally). IMHO Lolly's new boobs aren't over the top and suit her taught, shapely frame. If they make her happier then who are we to argue. My personal thought is that this is all part of her attempt to break America (as is her downed website and apparent retirement). She's at the top of her game and with a boyfriend of lengthy talent and empathy, I think she's been leant on a little to create the American look. Whatever the reason, I wish her well and thank her for all the filth thus far.

Why isn't there such an outcry over Kerry Louise's constantly enhanced bod (lips, tits, tats etc)? I think she's bloody great but it baffles me why some girls are slated and other are beyond reproach.

I thought the exact same thing when Jordan pryce/alexandre cat was getting ripped to shreds. I think it's because they know she would reply and wouldn't take the abuse whereas other girls rarely post on here!

James... lips??? I had my top lip injected over 3yrs ago and havent had it done since so unsure how u would bring that up ... also my tits were 'overly enhanced' before i entered the adult industry to which i recently got them re-done


The way I see it girls have surgery because they can afford to and wish to feel more comfortable, non of the girls I know have had their surgery to get more work in porn. I think its quite rude how u post threads complaining about this when really its nobodys business but their own. At the end of the day If you do not like someones looks then dont watch them

I'm not a fan of Kerry Louise that's why I never mentioned her surgery as I don't care but I was disappointed Lolly did as I used to fancy her something rotten!
Of course she can do what she wants to herself I'm not saying she can't, just voicing my opinion and disappointment and of course I have stopped watching her new stuff.
People can have opinions for and against something as long as they're not nasty and I haven't seen anyone in here calling her a bitch etc or throwing abuse at her for having the surgery, just people saying if they find it attractive or not.

I just dont think its required, as long as lolly is happy then thats all that matters

Interesting how when models want opinions (usually in the hope it will make them some money buy visiting a website etc.) they will ask for it but when a fan tries to give an opinion they get turned on or put down by models.

Also laughable when a 'fan' of the star then uses the post to question manhood etc. in the hope they will get a pat on the back (at minimum) but no real shock.

I agree with Kerry it's best saying nothing but not because it's wrong to give an opinion but more because the model in question won't give a fuck so it's a bit of a waste of time.

Well I can't speak for everyone but for me personally, I didn't post on here to try and communicate with Lolly, just to share opinions on the subject and see how others felt. It's called conversation and everyone has differing opinions. Some for and some against. What a boring world it would be if no one had different opinions and anyone who did was not allowed to voice it.

No one has shot down people who have posted in here saying the do like fake boobs so why can't people voice the opposite opinion too without being told if they don't like fake boobs they should say nothing.

It's an open forum

People are entitled to their opinions good or bad

Some people like fake boobs others don't

Some people like tatoos and piercings others don't


Different strokes for different folks

I'm not sure that Jamesr's assertion that it's a vocal minority is right. There may be a minority of people expressing views on these enhancements, but that is the nature of things; a minority of people will always speak up, but that shouldn't be taken that they're the only ones with the views expressed.
I'm not sure it's as difficult to get close to a pornstar as you think James; there are a fair few ways. Saying it's envy defies logic; I have no desire for boobs, enhanced or otherwise!
The 'long hair' you describe is almost always false, and 'decent size' is not necessarily the only or relevant selling point. There is a case for naturalness too, a matter of taste.
To some people Lolly's new boobs are attractive, to others they're grotesque - a matter of taste. It's not a question of arguing, just having and expressing a view.

As Kerry Louise said herself, she had her boobs done before she became a known name (as it happens I fancy her like crazy anyway!!), so the comparison is not valid.

I defend Jamesr's right to have his (misguided) views, and would hope he'd give everyone the same courtesy.

Unbelievable. Write something rational and of one's own opinion and get derided. What's the point of having a forum if opinions get shot down in flames?

And chill out Kerry Louise, if you'd read my comments properly, you'd note that I wasn't commenting or criticising anything about you. I was simply commenting on how some (non-posting) pornstars are criticised while tohers (doing similar things) are seemingly beyond reproach.