Page 2 of 2

Re: Question for soft porn fans

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:03 pm
by Ratters Pank
I've seen a fair bit of your work Iain and I have always been very impressed. There is defo a market out there for the kind of stuff you shoot: basically, beautiful young women posing naked - what could be better?! Don't get me wrong, I like my hardcore too but I find that you need contrasts in life and sometimes a beautiful young girl posing naked, maybe with the odd toy or two, is just what the doctor ordered! !grin!

Like One Eyed Jack said though, the key to your site's success could be to find relatively unknown models. As it will be a soft core site, then it should be easier to find girls who are prepared to work at that level, so there is every chance it will suceed. Put it this way, if there were plenty of bare footed Scots girls on there then I would sign up straight away!!

All the best mate !thumbsup!


Re: Question for soft porn fans

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:13 pm
by pbphotography
Iain

If you are the Iain T from purestorm then then your pictures are excellent.

This kind of site is my favourite. The best best in my opinion being a site that used to be on the web I am not sure if it is

domai.com

Your work is better than most on these sites.

The biggest issue you will have is geting people to see them.

You would need to talk to a successful promoter and see how they get their sites promoted.

Good Luck if you wish to do it as like I say I am a fan of your work.!happy!

Re: Question for soft porn fans

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:33 am
by Floydoid
Speaking as an interested observer, I certainly think there is a market for high class softcore sites. If you can get anywhere near the quality of sites such as metart, domai, hegre, amour angels, glossy angels, etc, then you'll be onto a winner.

Good luck mate.


Re: Question for soft porn fans

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:13 am
by S4
Hi Ian

Personally i think it is a worthwhile project and something ive been thinking about for a while.The hardcore stuff is generally of an incredibly poor standard
(photography wise) because too many dont think its important and now it all looks exactly the same.Though there will always be a market for it , its all disappearing up its own backside,thanks largely to digital cameras.
If you look at any mainstream material from 20 years ago the quality was way better as in general it wasnt being shot by mortgage advisors in their spare time.
Do it properly and i think you may find the market suprisingly agreeable.

Good luck

Pete