Yes, I agree its exciting to see pussy on a live show.
Personally, I cant understand why masturbation wearing knickers is ok, but masturbation without knickers is not ok. I think Ofcoms rules are more about spoiling peoples fun, rather than protecting the public. And you could say that about the BBFC as well.
Yes it would be great to see more clips.
Why Ofcom?
Re: Why Ofcom?
That's exactly how I see it "smlewis", I don't always want to watch hardcore porn. These shows used to be enjoyable, they are live and the girls are pretty!
When Babestar took things a bit further were they really causing a problem with society? Clearly not.
Since the removal of Babestar ofcom have all the other channels running scared, 15 shows with MOSTLY great looking girls so restricted they are hardly even worth watching now.
A girl pulling her panties to the side or down is not explicit and certainly not hardcore, you get to see more on bravo!
And that phone number thing is bullshit, its a cop out, like you say they are more focused on destroying fun that making rules that make sense.
Anyway man, here is a link to the site these clips came from, there you will find lots of clips from live24 (The turkey show) and hundreds of other clips from liveshows all around the world, even some old UK ones from babestar and sexstation when they were still interesting!
The hottest clips are from, "Sexychannel", "Hot chili", old "Sexysat" and "live24", lots of spread pussy's and some dildo and finger insertion.
Often the newest clips are updated in the discussion section, and only some get moved to the multimedia section.
You have to register, but it is free!
http://www.sexysat-tv.com/
Maybe one day are country will see sense smlewis, here's hoping!
When Babestar took things a bit further were they really causing a problem with society? Clearly not.
Since the removal of Babestar ofcom have all the other channels running scared, 15 shows with MOSTLY great looking girls so restricted they are hardly even worth watching now.
A girl pulling her panties to the side or down is not explicit and certainly not hardcore, you get to see more on bravo!
And that phone number thing is bullshit, its a cop out, like you say they are more focused on destroying fun that making rules that make sense.
Anyway man, here is a link to the site these clips came from, there you will find lots of clips from live24 (The turkey show) and hundreds of other clips from liveshows all around the world, even some old UK ones from babestar and sexstation when they were still interesting!
The hottest clips are from, "Sexychannel", "Hot chili", old "Sexysat" and "live24", lots of spread pussy's and some dildo and finger insertion.
Often the newest clips are updated in the discussion section, and only some get moved to the multimedia section.
You have to register, but it is free!
http://www.sexysat-tv.com/
Maybe one day are country will see sense smlewis, here's hoping!
Re: Why Ofcom?
Thanks MrA, thats a great site and I spent most of yesterday afternoon downloading. Lots of great clips. I just wish I lived in Italy, but then I wouldnt get much else done apart from watch TV !
Re: Why Ofcom?
LOL, smlewis, I know what you are saying about not getting much done.
Yeah, the site is pretty cool! Wish there were more old Babestar clips though! Especially Jada ones.
Yeah, the site is pretty cool! Wish there were more old Babestar clips though! Especially Jada ones.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Why Ofcom?
I believe it's all down to the rise of the Gay brigade not wanting real men to see a nice slippery slit every now and then.
They think we want to see Graham Norton on every bloody channel!
They think we want to see Graham Norton on every bloody channel!
Re: Mary Whitehouse writes:
Master of Darkness wrote:
> They think we want to see Graham Norton on every bloody
> channel!
Well, I for one do.
Perhaps being garrotted, on BBC1; being hung, drawn and quartered on
BBC2; lowered into a vat of suphuric acid on ITV, and so forth.
Good family entertainment.
> They think we want to see Graham Norton on every bloody
> channel!
Well, I for one do.
Perhaps being garrotted, on BBC1; being hung, drawn and quartered on
BBC2; lowered into a vat of suphuric acid on ITV, and so forth.
Good family entertainment.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Why Ofcom?
I wonder whether there'd be any demand for, and whether it'd be logistically possible, for there to be a dvd release featuring the girls of Babecast/BabeStation/Sex Station etc....
Nothing hardcore, but something a bit more explicit than what they can show on tv.
Nothing hardcore, but something a bit more explicit than what they can show on tv.
Re: Why Ofcom?
They can show R18 on TV. There is nothing in current UK Law that says they can't, even Ofcon admit this.
quis custodiet ipsos custodes
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Why Ofcom?
100% correct. The ONLY reason R18 is not allowed on tv is that it's too explicit for Ofcon. They can't cope with the imagery. Of course, they say it's about child protection but that's easily disproved by a number of factors. I.M.O. if it was allowed, then it'd be a huge boost for the U.K. adult industry.
-
- Posts: 12410
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Why Ofcom?
Jacques wrote:
They can show R18 on TV. There is nothing in current UK Law that says they can't, even Ofcon admit this.
Sure it may not be written in black an white but then how come Xplicit, Sport and all these satellite channels get fined whopping amounts then?
Are you saying if they didnt pay the fines theat it cant be enforced then?
I'm sure it is written somewhere or someone (especially David Sullivan) would have challenged this so far.
They can show R18 on TV. There is nothing in current UK Law that says they can't, even Ofcon admit this.
Sure it may not be written in black an white but then how come Xplicit, Sport and all these satellite channels get fined whopping amounts then?
Are you saying if they didnt pay the fines theat it cant be enforced then?
I'm sure it is written somewhere or someone (especially David Sullivan) would have challenged this so far.
www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples