Charlene Hart
Re: Charlene Hart
She did do all that she "is meant to have done" and more besides but she does have a fan base.
Further, she does keep cropping up in different guises - topless model, porn star, track girl, TV presenter - so it is fair for people to post wondering if she has decided what it is she actually wants to do.
Further, she does keep cropping up in different guises - topless model, porn star, track girl, TV presenter - so it is fair for people to post wondering if she has decided what it is she actually wants to do.
-
Dickie Davies
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Charlene Hart
Well, Autolycus, you know she denies that. I remember a while back it being posted that she was stopping being a model because of all the stories.
I thought that was sad (still do) and I think we should let sleeping dogs lie. Neither SmileTV nor Party People are porn (unless you are very, very repressed) so I really think the subjkect of Charlene should be let drop and the Admin should intervene if another one is started up.
Her fans should surely want to give her a chance rather than have what she may have done years ago dragged up time and time again. I use "may" simply because she denies the extreme stuff.
And I'm amazed that charlenehart.com is still going!
I thought that was sad (still do) and I think we should let sleeping dogs lie. Neither SmileTV nor Party People are porn (unless you are very, very repressed) so I really think the subjkect of Charlene should be let drop and the Admin should intervene if another one is started up.
Her fans should surely want to give her a chance rather than have what she may have done years ago dragged up time and time again. I use "may" simply because she denies the extreme stuff.
And I'm amazed that charlenehart.com is still going!
Re: Charlene Hart
Charlenehart.com has nothing to do with her.
Not sure how much can be posted: she did do all the extreme stuff that is rumoured (I have seen most of them) and she did quit the business because of one man's vendetta against her.
She appears to have returned and fame is not like a tap - it can't be turned off. Charlene was a well-known model who ruined it all by doing some silly things. Therefore people are going to be interested in her. It's the same as when "legit" celeb's nude pics resurface - people are interested, rightly or wrongly.
Not sure how much can be posted: she did do all the extreme stuff that is rumoured (I have seen most of them) and she did quit the business because of one man's vendetta against her.
She appears to have returned and fame is not like a tap - it can't be turned off. Charlene was a well-known model who ruined it all by doing some silly things. Therefore people are going to be interested in her. It's the same as when "legit" celeb's nude pics resurface - people are interested, rightly or wrongly.
Re: Charlene Hart
Remember when I ask this question do not berate me, I did not start this thread I just rememeber charlene on babestation a few years back. What do you mean by extreme? I take it you don't mean just B/G scenes, you mean some fucked up shit, like what? I had no idea, if it is true that is. Now I'm curious it's like saying I know something but I'm not telling you, you just have to know.......How extreme?
Re: Charlene Hart
Dickie Davies wrote:
'-it's all been said and can be found by searching the forum.'
OK - done that - didn't find much. So it must have been rather a long way back in the Archive section. Looked there too, but at least 99.9% of that seems to have been removed, so no joy there.
Time for a refresher, I think.
Anyone?
'-it's all been said and can be found by searching the forum.'
OK - done that - didn't find much. So it must have been rather a long way back in the Archive section. Looked there too, but at least 99.9% of that seems to have been removed, so no joy there.
Time for a refresher, I think.
Anyone?
-
Dickie Davies
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Charlene Hart
Vila - I found 53 items searching charlene hart on all forums which counts as quite a bit in my book. I also remember another thread in the recent past which was deleted.
Generally I think it is sad that we (me included) are inadvertently pursuing the original man's vendetta against Charlene. We wouldn't know about the extreme stuff (I've never looked or wanted to) without him and now, no-one can mention her name without it being alluded to pretty quickly.
Fame, such as it is, can be turned off and there are certainly a number of precedents on BGAFD - the main one being Tasmin Le Vann. Lots of us know the name she worked under, but it can't be mentioned here and is not on BGAFD. More often simply a photo has been removed - Katy from a couple of Ben Dover vids is an example of this.
I think Charlene should now join this list.
Anyway, I've made my point.
Generally I think it is sad that we (me included) are inadvertently pursuing the original man's vendetta against Charlene. We wouldn't know about the extreme stuff (I've never looked or wanted to) without him and now, no-one can mention her name without it being alluded to pretty quickly.
Fame, such as it is, can be turned off and there are certainly a number of precedents on BGAFD - the main one being Tasmin Le Vann. Lots of us know the name she worked under, but it can't be mentioned here and is not on BGAFD. More often simply a photo has been removed - Katy from a couple of Ben Dover vids is an example of this.
I think Charlene should now join this list.
Anyway, I've made my point.
Re: Charlene Hart
Fame really can't be turned off. Just because TLV's picture has been removed from here does not mean that the entire internet has been swept clear of her images, clips and films. There are plenty of sites that feature her. There are guides to porn films that list her work.
What Charlene did was pretty revolting but she was over 18 and at the time seemed keen to do it.
We are all responsible for our actions and have to live with them - and hopefully learn from them.
What Charlene did was pretty revolting but she was over 18 and at the time seemed keen to do it.
We are all responsible for our actions and have to live with them - and hopefully learn from them.
Re: Charlene Hart
Have to say Dickie is dead right, charlenehart.com should have been closed a long time ago. The vendetta against Charlene has gone on a long time yet despite that she is never anything other than open and friendly to her fans. The fact that she is back on TV again is wonderful yet it seems people on this board are determined to finally see this wonderful model retire for good. Leave her alone and let her get on with her career.
Some of the people who use this Forum need to take a very long hard look at themselves as this sort of treatment isn't solely left for Charlene, others have suffered aswell and its the reason I hardly use this forum now and why I asked for my links to be taken off.
Why can't you people concentrate on the wonderful talent the UK has in the porn world and let the equally talented Glamour models get on with what they do best?
Some of the people who use this Forum need to take a very long hard look at themselves as this sort of treatment isn't solely left for Charlene, others have suffered aswell and its the reason I hardly use this forum now and why I asked for my links to be taken off.
Why can't you people concentrate on the wonderful talent the UK has in the porn world and let the equally talented Glamour models get on with what they do best?
http://www.celebritiesrus.com/blog
Re: Charlene Hart
So when a model decides she's not 100% happy with her past career everyone should just pretend it never happened?
Fair enough as Dickie said the precedent has been set on this site but I gotta agree with Autolycus, outside this place there will continue to be discussion and Googling shows that a lot of it comes from fans of that kinda thing so it's not malicious.
Fair enough as Dickie said the precedent has been set on this site but I gotta agree with Autolycus, outside this place there will continue to be discussion and Googling shows that a lot of it comes from fans of that kinda thing so it's not malicious.