Page 2 of 5

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:19 am
by blackjaques
I suspect they're talking about the freeview. Even under encryption these days on Sportxxx you do not see anything like you used to. It's really toned down its strength, probably under the "Gypsy's warning" from Ofcon. The channel's had it, unless they become harder.bunnybg wrote:

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:33 am
by jasonhallceltic
roxanna i'm not personally attacking you i know its ofcoms fault, and i don't measure angles darling, i don't watch sportxxx very often, i happened 2 lick it on one night and saw the guy sticking a black dildo into his pants! i don't want to argue just saying what i saw!

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:42 am
by Arginald Valleywater
This channel is a fraud. It is tamer than all the other encrypted channels. The encrypted stuff is so tame it could be FTA, more close ups and genitalia on Playboy ONE. 2 years ago this channel set the standard, now it is a laughing stock, XXX may arse.

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:46 am
by Hawkins


There is no way they are going to let a guy fuck a girl on live free to air tv. Even say if they pixalated it out they still would not do it. Heck they didnt even do this when they were doing much harder stuff on the encrypted live show did they?

I have seen a few shows now with guys on and its obvious that they are not having intercourse. Its simulated sex, they pretend.

He was having sex with her for three hours?. That should tell you right there that theres no way its real.

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:06 pm
by matt_hudson10
saw them 'at it' the other week. though you could see his cock swinging between her legs. since then they bend over a pillow. not convinced its real. the other night near the end of free view a blonde lass was riding him like a trooper, they stopped a few times and he looked like he was putting some thing back in her, dick or dildo though im not sure. it was hot though, real or fake.

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:10 pm
by blackjaques
The fact that we are having this discussion of "was he or wasn't he performing the sex act" is illustration enough of the sorry state of what passes for adult entertainment on UK television. In Europe they would be laughing at us ( or pttying us more like). We haven't moved on very far from Robin Askwith and Anthony Booth's " Confessions of a Window Cleaner" and other screen gems like that, have we. We all know who Booth's son in law is too.

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:04 pm
by jasonhallceltic
well said^^

Re: LMFO At Roxanne.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:09 am
by Hawkins


Are viewers not supposed to think for themselves and question certain things that they see?

Most Porn fans contrary to mainstream public belief are an intelligent bunch, this forum show that. If they think they are being mislead then they wll go ahead and say it.

Re: xxxsportbabes

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:18 am
by Arginald Valleywater
Ah good to see the performers are also in David Sullivan mode. Rip the punter and treat him like he has a low IQ. When will UK producers realise porn is now perfectly acceptable to most modern couples and not simply aim it at young men. Give the punters what they want, value, quality and real sex, not pathetic acting.