Channel 4 porn survey

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
one eyed jack
Posts: 12410
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by one eyed jack »

hardly a reason to ban porn when its just a True Detective magazine and a bunch of soft core.

My argument would be that maybe the use of this material while it may have kindled the fantasy that was always there anyway, may have also slowed down his propensity to kill more than he did.

In short if this material was never there he would have probably committed more murders and rapes....So what difference does it make?

Banning porn is not a solution at all. Besides how can you ever ban something now that people can make from their own bedrooms and swap anyway over the internet?

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
Jacques
Posts: 4169
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by Jacques »

The vast majority of people who want to ban porn are religous fruitcakes and feminists. Where is the evidence of harm? The High Court couldn't find any when it fully allowed the R18 classifcation. If you want to ban or censor something it must cause harm, the 'we don't like it' defence does not even come into it. I don't like gay porn, but I don't want it banned just because I don't like watching it, I'll just change the channel or watch something that I do like instead.
quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Jock Strap
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by Jock Strap »

Basically Bundy went into the interview claiming full responsibility for what he did but then caught on to what the religious fruitcfake wanted him to say - that porn was to blame. They both used each other. It was one last desperate attempt at redemption for Bundy and he made a great poster boy for the far-right religious lobby who want porn banned.
Blaming the True Detective magazines is no more valid than blaming porn.
And when Bundy was a nipper Playboy was only just coming out so there was no real porn as we know it.
All they found when Bundy was nicked was a bunch of cheerleader magazines aimed at 12 year old girls.
The porn argument is a crock of shit.
Bundy killed because he was mentally ill - a psychopath and it's as simple as that.

[url=http://www.jock-strap.info/porn-sites]JOCK STRAP'S PORN SITES[/url]
andy at handiwork
Posts: 4113
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by andy at handiwork »

I just want to say that I read the Guardian, have done since my early teens, and shoot porn quite a lot. I will admit it can be a bit po-faced sometimes though, when it comes to porn.
dantheman
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by dantheman »

I think he can blame porn for killing people if he wants too, others blame the way the person looked at them, or even because they were bored and had nothing to do..

It's very strange how only 1 person in 2006 years have blamed porn for killing someone and now its a big epidemic that has to be stopped.
johnnyfavourite
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by johnnyfavourite »

I think if Channel 4 want to push to ban anything for fear that it might corrupt or encourage people into violent action then they're probably better off banning documentaries about mass murderers and serial killers.

'...move calmly, move cautiously. You'll never be sorry.'
strictlybroadband
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by strictlybroadband »

Lay off us Guardian readers... I'm a Guardian-reading porn seller, and proud of both. !grin!

[url=http://www.strictlybroadband.com/]Strictly Broadband[/url]: new movies published daily, 365 days a year!
Taffoski
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Channel 4 porn survey

Post by Taffoski »



Hope this works

Post Reply