egafd.com

http://www.strictlybroadband.com/trailers/Lea_Walker.wmv

"silicone-enhanced mutant"

I bet you're no spring chicken, mate.

It's the same with Nichola Holt. Poor girl, there's nothing wrong with her and yet everytime there's a thread about her someone has to say how ugly she is. I think she's an ace performer but meh...this for once isn't about her. From the trailer I've seen Lea Walker definately isn't as "mutated" as some of the women I've seen in porn. The only problem I saw was she wasn't really into it (see LDM). I've seen worse women (not to repeat what's been said before), but I don't go out of my way to complain.

Totally crap. I think that just about sums her up.

I don't think people are slagging her off for what she's done (made a porn film) just how she has done it (really badly) that scene is crap and she is dull, laboured and boring in it.

Couldnt agre more, why is Cathy Barry fawnd over on these boards, yet Lea is cast as some sort of hideous mutant.

Have some respect guys

The issue isn't about me, mate. I'm not an adult performer and, there again, neither do I have a body full of silicone. In any case, you haven't got a clue whether I'm a spring chicken or not so it was a pretty ludicrous thing to say based on no other evidence than the fact that I've criticised Lea Walker. I've never ever slated Nichola Holt. I think she's fantastic. Truly great performer with personality and a sexy Bolton accent! The fact that she looks like a cross between a tree-hugging eco-activist and an NF bovva-boy is beside the point. She looks like she's enjoying herself and her svelte little body is all real!

Why is any criticism of the scene being removed from this forum? I have had two replies removed where I stated the scene was no good and at least 2 other similar replies have been removed as well, they were not offensive - just opinions. Its no coincidence I presume that there is a link on the front page and someone is raking it in due to the Big Brother thing, but I don't think one critical thread reply is going to alter that? (waits for reply to be removed)

You have had one reply removed because it was attached to a post which we considered offensive. No other replies have been removed. The only reason dave78's original post remains up is because of the rebuttals posted by other members.

That said, we will remove this thread in it's entirety if it continues to attract abusive comments. Not because we are "raking it in", but because we have a policy of removing all such posts, as explained in the FAQ.

My post is opinionated, not abusive.