She also appeared on the Men & Motors programme 'The Hot House' in late 1998 together with her father/manager Bob Parker. In the interview she said that she was aged 16 and had been topless modeling since May 1998.
Magazine/Newspaper appearances that I have a note of were:
Whitehouse International #16 (1998)
Whitehouse International #17 (1998)
Sport Newspaper (August 1998)
People Newspaper (March 1999)
Sunday Sport Magazine (1 October 2000)
Zoe Parker
Re: Zoe Parker
Hi, I found this forum after doing a search on Google for more info about Zoe, I think the documentry you are talking about is the one that's downloadable from this site http://teenyvideovault.com
I recently joined up as a member to the site and download a DIVX featuring Zoe that looks like its a full video capture of the original documentry with sound etc, its was very entertaining and its a shame Zoe gave up modelling in the end as she was very attractive and seemed quite down to earth and not full of herself like some other page 3 models.
To join the site cost me 20 Euros for the month but there are other vids to download I especially enjoyed seeing the teen twins sucking each others tits, so i think its was worth it.
Does anyone know of any more sites with picture/vids of Zoe on them, I would especially like to see her whitehouse sets or some pics from the Daily sport
I recently joined up as a member to the site and download a DIVX featuring Zoe that looks like its a full video capture of the original documentry with sound etc, its was very entertaining and its a shame Zoe gave up modelling in the end as she was very attractive and seemed quite down to earth and not full of herself like some other page 3 models.
To join the site cost me 20 Euros for the month but there are other vids to download I especially enjoyed seeing the teen twins sucking each others tits, so i think its was worth it.
Does anyone know of any more sites with picture/vids of Zoe on them, I would especially like to see her whitehouse sets or some pics from the Daily sport
Re: Zoe Parker
Cool, might check that out.
Like the sound of those twins, but think I've seen that before.
Are they brunettes?
No matter, might well check it out anyway.
Like the sound of those twins, but think I've seen that before.
Are they brunettes?
No matter, might well check it out anyway.
Re: Zoe Parker
Hi there. I work for The Sport.
Zoe was a very popular model during the short time she was working although we were all rather troubled by the role her stepfather played in her career.
She was a very friendly, outgoing girl. It's our understanding that she is no longer modelling and in a relationship. We also think that her stepfather is now, if not estranged, then at least playing a less "hands on" role in her life.
Since the recent Sexual Offences act became law all the pictures we had of Zoe have now been destroyed as she was under 18 when they were taken.
hope this helps
Zoe was a very popular model during the short time she was working although we were all rather troubled by the role her stepfather played in her career.
She was a very friendly, outgoing girl. It's our understanding that she is no longer modelling and in a relationship. We also think that her stepfather is now, if not estranged, then at least playing a less "hands on" role in her life.
Since the recent Sexual Offences act became law all the pictures we had of Zoe have now been destroyed as she was under 18 when they were taken.
hope this helps
Re: Zoe Parker
What a silly law that must be, Orwellian or wot. We can fuck them but we cannot look at them..... Blair's Britain, such a wonderful place! They won't be getting their mitts on my treasured copies of Whitehouse!
Incidentally, out with my mate Hank last night and he pulled an absolute dead-ringer for Zoe, had to be seen to be believed!
Incidentally, out with my mate Hank last night and he pulled an absolute dead-ringer for Zoe, had to be seen to be believed!
www.credence.org
Re: Zoe Parker
Erm, best not to admit that you have those particular treasured copies of Whitehouse, as I understand it.
In theory, anyone in possession of nude pics of someone who was under 18 when the shot was taken is in contravention of this law.
That's why the Sport's had to destroy all its photos, whether or not it was planning to print them ever again - even 'possession' is illegal.
I repeat, that's only my understanding of the new legislation, I'm happy for someone to post and contradict me if I'm wrong.
In addition, I'd be astounded if anyone was ever actually taken to court for possessing a copy of a old magazine which was perfectly legal when it went on sale.
But due to its retrospective nature, they COULD be - that's the daft thing about this law.
In theory, anyone in possession of nude pics of someone who was under 18 when the shot was taken is in contravention of this law.
That's why the Sport's had to destroy all its photos, whether or not it was planning to print them ever again - even 'possession' is illegal.
I repeat, that's only my understanding of the new legislation, I'm happy for someone to post and contradict me if I'm wrong.
In addition, I'd be astounded if anyone was ever actually taken to court for possessing a copy of a old magazine which was perfectly legal when it went on sale.
But due to its retrospective nature, they COULD be - that's the daft thing about this law.
Re: Zoe Parker
That is our exactly understanding too. Obviously we took legal advice.
It meant that we lost loads of stuff including all the early topless stuff Linsey Dawn did at 16 and 17 and if there is any doubt now we just bin it.
I don't think there is any real risk about having old stuff around. I think there has to be a complaint before any action is taken but we are not prepared to take that risk. None of us wants to end up on the sexual offenders register for reprinting a picture that is model-released and was quite legal once but now isn't.
Still, any child protection legislation must be heeded and accepted as a positive thing. I'm sure everyone on here would agree with that.
But on a different issue...with Eric Clapton being all over the press due to the Cream shows...I am still very troubled by that Blind Faith album cover with the naked pre-pubescent girl.
Can you really call that art and get away with it? Under this legislation surely it is illegal whatever justification they try to use?
It meant that we lost loads of stuff including all the early topless stuff Linsey Dawn did at 16 and 17 and if there is any doubt now we just bin it.
I don't think there is any real risk about having old stuff around. I think there has to be a complaint before any action is taken but we are not prepared to take that risk. None of us wants to end up on the sexual offenders register for reprinting a picture that is model-released and was quite legal once but now isn't.
Still, any child protection legislation must be heeded and accepted as a positive thing. I'm sure everyone on here would agree with that.
But on a different issue...with Eric Clapton being all over the press due to the Cream shows...I am still very troubled by that Blind Faith album cover with the naked pre-pubescent girl.
Can you really call that art and get away with it? Under this legislation surely it is illegal whatever justification they try to use?
Re: Zoe Parker
There must surely be a marked difference between publishing such photo's now, and being in possession of a magazine/paper that was bought legally at the time.
The "thin end of the wedge" is definitely getting thicker....
Will they be increasing the age of consent next or what??
The "thin end of the wedge" is definitely getting thicker....
Will they be increasing the age of consent next or what??
www.credence.org
Re: Zoe Parker
I've been wondering whether Blair / the govt want to create a 'buffer zone'...the ages of 16-18 being that 'zone'.
They are probably, and rightly concerned about underage sex and in particular teen / young pregnancies.
While they may or may not change the age of consent (who knows, I guess it's a possibility although I doubt they'll go that far), by a bit of finger waving and show of power to try to avert some people from some form of attention to girls between 16-18 (already the fact that while many under the age of 18 male or female will go drinking and/or clubbing, that is another law that can be enforced), they are probably try to have an effect on sexual attention and/or activity towards / with girls from the age of 16 and up.
This could have a positive effect on teenage sexual actity, or people having sex with teenagers...
Hmm, I'm rambling, and not sure whether I'm onto something or not, but the govt obviously have some agenda here...
They are probably, and rightly concerned about underage sex and in particular teen / young pregnancies.
While they may or may not change the age of consent (who knows, I guess it's a possibility although I doubt they'll go that far), by a bit of finger waving and show of power to try to avert some people from some form of attention to girls between 16-18 (already the fact that while many under the age of 18 male or female will go drinking and/or clubbing, that is another law that can be enforced), they are probably try to have an effect on sexual attention and/or activity towards / with girls from the age of 16 and up.
This could have a positive effect on teenage sexual actity, or people having sex with teenagers...
Hmm, I'm rambling, and not sure whether I'm onto something or not, but the govt obviously have some agenda here...
Re: Zoe Parker
Spin, you were publishing under age photos of Cheery Dee after the law came into effect, the only difference being you claimed that she was 18...which she was not! naughty.... 