Page 2 of 4

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 9:20 pm
by Holly
Sean,

Thankyou for doing the correct thing (If Avalon had indeed been ripped off/misrepresented) For the sake of good order I am replying to your post that her details were publicised by myself in good faith having been supplied to a brief by Walpole Models. Whilst fake photos do occur it would be advisable for interested parties to check the facts of the matter before posting potentially libellous comments on a public forum.

Thankyou & Good-Night, Holly Gold.

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:27 pm
by Avalon
Hi Holly,

Yes we spoke earlier on the phone about this, I have emailed the agent in question and asked them about this and will call them tommorow to ask if it was in fact them who gave you my details. I also received an email from some else telling me that my pictures have been on your site for 2 months now and allegedly I have been was advertised for the Southampton party also. Is it true my pictures have been on there for 2 months?

I feel I am well within my right to post a notice on a public forum letting people know that I do not infact do these group sex/gang bang parties at your events or any other.

I will check tommorow that my pictues and details have been removed and look forward to an end to this matter, thank you, Avalon xx

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:51 am
by Holly
Hi Avalon,

I am very suprised to see that from one professional to another you are questioning my integrity concerning the Walpole Group & my business. Suffice to say that your post simply smacks of cattiness, how much better would it have been to wait until Ian/Debbie are in there office & will confirm the facts.

Holly Gold.

Re: Abusive Mail

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:59 am
by Raven
I have spoken to Holly this morning and she has assured me that she got Avalons details from the Walpole group.
I also understand that she spoke to Avalon a few hours before Avalon posted on here and it was supposed to have been sorted out.

The thing I would like to address is that some sad bastard has used the details supplied by misterc and taken it upon himself to get a couple of free e-mail addresses and send me some abuse and threats about using other peoples pics.

As I said I am no longer involved with the site in question so I would suggest you crawl back under the rock you came from and get a life.

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:07 am
by Pianaman
Why on earth shouldn't she post this in a public forum?- if I was her I'd be fucking furious someone has posted this without permission - it's a huge slur on her integrity whoever was behind it whether it was a mistake or not she has a right to set the record straight - nothing "catty" about that.

And I note no-one has even had the grace to apologise to her....

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:33 pm
by Bob Singleton
Pianaman wrote:

> Why on earth shouldn't she post this in a public forum?- if I
> was her I'd be fucking furious someone has posted this without
> permission - it's a huge slur on her integrity whoever was
> behind it whether it was a mistake or not she has a right to
> set the record straight - nothing "catty" about that.
>
> And I note no-one has even had the grace to apologise to
> her....

I wholeheartedly agree.

As someone who organises (full contact) lapdancing shows I too advertise which girls are going to appear, but only those that have actually AGREED to appear. I know plenty of people who think they can get away with posting pictures of girls who havn't been asked to appear in the hope of swelling customer numbers. It's not fair on the girls in question, nor is it fair on genuine and reputable organisers of events.

When girls don't turn up because they can't be bothered, or have a genuine excuse (anything from car trouble, illness etc) they get pilloried.

The fact no-one asked Avalon herself if she was available before putting up details and then not even apologising when she gets upset at the misrepresentation just goes to show how unprofessional some people are!


Is this the same Avalon ?

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:02 pm
by eroticartist
Is this the Avalon that acted so well in Swiingers Club?

See Avalon

Mike Freeman

Re: Is this the same Avalon ?

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:17 pm
by steve56
the 2 guys in the pic prob had HIV and std tests

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:50 pm
by Avalon
Hi there,

thanks for all your replies to this subject. Firstly the scene for Swingers club was a shoot and of course the two actors had full HIV and STD tests, otherwise I would not worked with them, this was not a real swingers party. At real Gang Bang/bukkake/sex parties girls give oral witout condoms, and do you know how many sexually transmitted deseases you can catch this way!! say if at these parties you were having sex with one of the guys and the condom broke! what the fuck then! Its hard to know much about the men who attend these events and personaly I think its risky. All the male actors have tests, which I insist on seeing before I work with them.

I just wanted to let everyone know I do not work at these events and you are correct in saying that my pictures should not have been placed there without my permission, I must add they have now been removed. I was not being 'catty' to Holly, just wanted to get the facts straight!!

Mike I dont think you comment is really relivant to this posting, Its not the same thing is it??

Thank you to you all, for your advice ect, X

Re: WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:04 pm
by MisterC
Raven wrote:

> The details for gentlemans pleasures.com are out of
> date.....the site is no longer in the control of Heavenly
> Enterprises, control has moved servers, webmasters and
> owners......
>
> I took care of it for a while but am no longer associated with
> it in any way shape or form.


Fair point. I would change the registration as a matter of urgency - it's a bit like selling a car and not telling Swansea. Anyway I hope as an innocent party you get no more offensive e-mails.

C