Re: Babestation, Babecast, BS2, Get-Horny, Live XXX
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:06 pm
Hmmm.... Tequila says the people who cast for these shows are actually women - that might go a long way towards explaining some of the, er, 'interesting' choices of presenter!
I won't mention any names, and can clearly understand the use of well-known or even up-and-coming glamour models on the progs, or talented girls who can obviously present in front of a camera, or girls who are clearly going to excite an audience by looking gorgeous and cheeky in the way Tiffany does as explained above.
But in my view, too many progs are filled with girls who fall into neither of those categories - not existing models, can't present for toffee and don't look the remotest bit attractive.
Now I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but surely there are countless girls out there crying out for a job on these shows? Why persist with several presenters with no figures, no talent and no credentials?
I won't mention any names, and can clearly understand the use of well-known or even up-and-coming glamour models on the progs, or talented girls who can obviously present in front of a camera, or girls who are clearly going to excite an audience by looking gorgeous and cheeky in the way Tiffany does as explained above.
But in my view, too many progs are filled with girls who fall into neither of those categories - not existing models, can't present for toffee and don't look the remotest bit attractive.
Now I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but surely there are countless girls out there crying out for a job on these shows? Why persist with several presenters with no figures, no talent and no credentials?