Page 2 of 4

Re: Interesting question...

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:51 pm
by Bayleaf
Kryten,

I think you can use the stunning adjective for Joanna too.


Further to Shaz's post....

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:56 pm
by JackHorny
This; I think, has been perhaps one of the most intriguing and engaging threads for a while and I'm quite disappointed that there hasn't been more input.

I don't think it's surprising though, given the obvious nature of the subject matter... And, I fully expect that the girls will actually give FULL backing to Joanna getting a listing. For obvious reasons, I think the girls are likely to be "more comfortable" with the TS issue than us Males.

I've now viewed Joanna's website - well, the preview pages anyway!

The subject matter; well... It's different, BUT, I'll admit it - to some extent - SOME of it is arousing! SHOCK HORROR! Yep... Looking at some of Joanna's preview pics, I did find myself viewing them in the same manner that I'd view girl on girl strap on action!

(I must however add that I was turned off by the softcore stuff and the Joanna & Male stuff - that really isn't for me - very much a turn-OFF. - but each to their own!)

I reckon I'd be quite happy to watch a Joanna Jet title featuring Joanna with girls. Watching Joanna with men - no... not for me.

And again - as I've stated before - if I wanted to find info on Joanna - where would I look to find it? HERE... Girl, or no girl - whatever your opinion on the matter, I actually think it's fairly irrelevant in so far as a database listing - it seems wholly natural to list somene going by the name of "Joanna" on this site...

I mean - let's be honest - I don't think Joanna is a bloke trying to get a listing "by the backdoor" (forgive the unintentional pun) - I mean, who'd do such a thing JUST to get a listing???

I'm firmly in favour of a listing... Joanna's not trying to hide anything - absolutely up front about it all - but in the interests of a comprehensive database - I say YES to a listing.

Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 4:08 pm
by Bayleaf
Since Joanna's treating this as a bit of a poll, as the person who reviewed her dvd for BGAFD here's my bit.

Perhaps I had a traumatic experience in my yoof (BSc (Hons) Zoology) but I know that, for humans, there are only two sexes, based on chromosomes X and Y. So biological sex is fixed at conception. (and if anyone wants to debate XXYs and XYY's email me privately!)

How we treat individuals socially, regardless of sex is something else, and may be termed 'gender'. Listeners to Radio 4's Feedback programme may had followed a lengthy discussion on this topic. While Joanna's biological sex is male, her gender is female. So as a person of female gender let's include her.

btw we are all assuming Joanna has a Britsh passport :-).


Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 4:19 pm
by joe king
'I truly believe the world of porn will be the first place that will come to recognise the existence of a third sex: the shemale.
The shemale, an artificially created sex that consists of male sexuality wrapped within a female shell.'

fivestar has 383 items in the genre 'she-male /trans'.
I think they already do 'recognise the existence of a third sex'.



Artificial is the right word, you like a bit like a taller version of Layla~Jade (with a cock).

As Alan Partridge said 'I'm interested - not that I'm gay or out, it is curious'.


Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 4:34 pm
by jj
...and talking of 'artificiality', where do boob-jobs and the like fit in?
Seems there's merely a continuum, rather than clear divisions.

Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:26 am
by Pussy_eater
Not my cup of tea, sorry!

Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:55 am
by seymourpussy
As someone who has had the pleasure of Joanne!! (top) let me put to rest the perception that she males are blokes with wigs. Joanne is a class apart shapley sexy, very very feminine and a lovely person to boot . Her sexuality would put a lot of females in the shade, yes she has a cock but that is the only part that lends to the male gender. Without a doubt I feel Joanne should be included.

Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:30 am
by Deuce Bigolo
There are only 3 votes that count in you being listed

Those of the 1/2/3 dictators in this fascist state

So as long as you meet the current criteria you should be a shoe in

cheers
B...OZ

Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:14 pm
by davey
this forum is about British GIRLS and girls do not have cocks.enough said


Re: Is BGAFD ready for such a leap?

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:34 pm
by seymourpussy
It was once thought the earth was flat, you have to broaden your mind!!