Onlyfans - reviews

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Leanholes2834
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:43 pm

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Leanholes2834 »

Alan67

sign up here and you may get some value for money, especially if you post a comment on this particular thread

https://forums.socialmediagirls.com/threads/porchia-watson.10953
spare_leg
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by spare_leg »

satch9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> any truth in the rumour that sophia smith has done
> a toy / vibe video on her only fans?


Is this still available on Sophia's OF or gone forever?
Leanholes2834
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:43 pm

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Leanholes2834 »

It will be still available to everyone who was sent it in a PPV message. She sent one out recently again for ?50, Not worth it IMO. Also i think you only have to sub for a month and she send out PPV to all her past subs too.
supernoo
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:22 pm

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by supernoo »

I think Charlie Rose's sale technique isn't too dissimilar to what Alan67 describes for Flick Hill's. In the PPV's she's naked, but the camera angles means it's more conservative than the titles would suggest.

Lesson to learn, if there's no preview, or the preview is lame, it's because the content is no good.

On the other hand Ariel Anderssen's Onlyfans is great. In the main feed there's good content and the PPVs are very reasonably priced, $5-$7 usually. More importantly, you get exactly what is described, no bull.
Alan67
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Alan67 »

supernoo - totally agree on Ariel Anderssen - her OF is just how it should be done - and nice to see her getting very rude. Would be good to see her with a real cock - maybe one day!

I did try Charlie Rose about 6 months ago, not great and like most too many upsells.

This whole OF phenonominum really gets to me - to me its all a way of ripping the paying punter off!
satch9
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by satch9 »

I would disagree re sophia smith I think her content is great.

Becky speed is very good and getting way nsughtier in ppvs but worth it if you're a fan.

Charlie rose is playing the game for all it is worth.
satch9
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by satch9 »

Forgot to add ariel's is also superb
Alan67
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Alan67 »

One of the worst for bad descriptions in PPV is Porchia Watson - such a ripoff!
AllanP
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 7:14 pm

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by AllanP »

Any recommendations?
Leanholes2834
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:43 pm

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Leanholes2834 »

Yes. Save your money. None of them are worth paying for.
Post Reply