Score Group respond to Omars lies about LDM
Score Group respond to Omars lies about LDM
Just in case he removes the thread.
"Omar is NOT shooting with Linsey. This is complete fabrication by Omar. LDM is under an exclusive modeling contract with the SCORE Group. Omar basically cornered Linsey while she was working a trade show on behalf of the SCORE Group and managed to get his picture shot with her and speak with her briefly. This whole routine of spamming everywhere saying this shoot will likely happen is inappropriate and a complete distortion of the reality. The only thing that has happened between Omar and Linsey is that Linsey now knows that Omar will manipulate any situation to make a buck, even if these lies create problems for Linsey with The SCORE Group, and LDM will likely avoid Omar like the plague if she sees again.
Im sure this will be deleted but Omar should be put on notice that the SCORE Group will protect its interests in our exclusive contract with Linsey and we are prepared to litigate these matters if need be.
David Uwate, esq.
The SCORE Group"
Re: Score Group respond to Omars lies about LDM
Yawn. Very dull. We consumers really dont care about industry in fighting.
Re: Score Group respond to Omars lies about LDM
And since the chances of LDM doing another b/g for ANYONE are vanishingly small, the whole thing is moot anyway..........
Am I the only one....
that ... really couldn't care less what either of these two do. In my personal opinion the UK porn scene would be no worse or no better without them and any collaboration...
Subject closed if you ask me - biggest non-event ever with little more than a minority holding any interest. Get over it!
Subject closed if you ask me - biggest non-event ever with little more than a minority holding any interest. Get over it!
Re: Am I the only one....
has LDM signed her life away forever with score group........maybe omar meant she was doing an over 60 special n years to come maybe....
well it's all a bit boring really, so let us know when she decides to do something a little harder and we might be a bit more interested
and as keith laird says(Phoenix nights).
theres no smoke without fire
well it's all a bit boring really, so let us know when she decides to do something a little harder and we might be a bit more interested
and as keith laird says(Phoenix nights).
theres no smoke without fire
Re: Am I the only one....
Well, I thought Magoo and I were trying to convey that very message, in our own different and obviously rather opaque ways..........
Re: Am I the only one....
JJ - there was a little more to my post - however, someone has chosen to edit it without mentioning the fact either to me by email or within the post itself...
I find that sort of censorship rather unnerving!
Nothing I said was in the slightest unlawful OR defamatoty... I was at pains to point out SEVERAL TIMES that it was "my personal opinion"...
If the person concerned wishes to email me with an explanation with regard to the censorship, I'd be most grateful... ukfyrfyter@aol.com
Oh... and yes - I did make a second tongue in cheek posting after bombers Phoenix Nights posting - I do apologise for that - but again, I don't think it crossed any legal lines and it was simply goon natured humour...
I find that sort of censorship rather unnerving!
Nothing I said was in the slightest unlawful OR defamatoty... I was at pains to point out SEVERAL TIMES that it was "my personal opinion"...
If the person concerned wishes to email me with an explanation with regard to the censorship, I'd be most grateful... ukfyrfyter@aol.com
Oh... and yes - I did make a second tongue in cheek posting after bombers Phoenix Nights posting - I do apologise for that - but again, I don't think it crossed any legal lines and it was simply goon natured humour...
Re: Am I the only one....
I can understand the mods. wanting to be careful etc. but shouldn't there be an indication when a post has been modified?
Mart
Mart
Re: Am I the only one....
Absolutely, there should indeed be an indication that; a) it has been edited and b) WHY?
I cannot fathom a reason - as I stated, nothing in my post was unlawful or defamatory... it was a case of my personal opinion as regards their status in, and "value" to, the industry...
Rather shameful for a liberated site that on the whole, I would say, condemns censorship...
I cannot fathom a reason - as I stated, nothing in my post was unlawful or defamatory... it was a case of my personal opinion as regards their status in, and "value" to, the industry...
Rather shameful for a liberated site that on the whole, I would say, condemns censorship...