Anal ....Why?
-
jj
legal question
......in which event I believe having sex with her would be illegal?
Or does the incest restriction not apply to adoptees?
Or does the incest restriction not apply to adoptees?
-
Shinryu
Re: legal question
I'm probably older than she is. Just a joke, man.
The whole thing is it would be cool to have ANY relationship with a chick as hot as she seems to be.
The whole thing is it would be cool to have ANY relationship with a chick as hot as she seems to be.
)-
golostruda
Re: Anal ....Why?
She is being fucked in the arse. Just like every night. And wearing ear-plugs to dim the yawns of us porno punters.
-
A Concerned Viewer
Re: Anal ....Why?
Off topic - but who is that with Max Hardcore in your picture?
-
Shinryu
Re: Anal ....Why?
I think her name is Amy Lee. I posted her since she's from Canada, close enough I guess.
Max says she quit after the shoot. Just wanted to do something kinky for once in her life.
Damn cute, and boy those legs were almost tied in a knot behind her head in the shoot. Damn impressive.
Max says she quit after the shoot. Just wanted to do something kinky for once in her life.
Damn cute, and boy those legs were almost tied in a knot behind her head in the shoot. Damn impressive.
-
Officer Dibble
Re: Anal ....Why? Golustruda
"The problem is that the punter seems to be being ignored in all of this."
True, you get the impression that some producers would much rather not have to bother trying to sell their product the those pesky punters and would much rather be left alone get on with their hobby - spitting on, slapping, pulling, and reaming girls assholes, any girls.
"It seems the obssession with anal sex lies with the producers and directors"
As I suggested further up the thread.
"not the punters or their 'voice' of sorts, the industry journalists and reviewers."
Most industry sorts are complicit. Most can't see the wood for the trees. Has anyone who makes their living from adult entertainment (apart from the Officer) chimed up here and been unequivocal that the gross overuse of anal in adult erotica is a load of ball-bag?
"Take the case of US porn girl Aurora Snow who appeared on the scene a couple of years ago, refusing to do anal sex or anything much more than standard 1m/1f or 2f scenes. She was pretty much universally acclaimed as the hottest, cutest, sweetest, most natural and girl-next-door girl to have emerged in years. Nine months later when she had sunk to taking two cocks up her ass in every film, everybody lost interest."
I can dig that. I don't find any female porn stars that would take part in extreme ass reaming gonzo the slightest bit appealing either. Quite the opposite. Call me old-fashioned if you will but I prefer my female objects of desire to be coy, pretty and sweet. That's the impression I get from the punters as well. The most popular girls seem to be the pretty/big boobed ones who just flirt with the hardcore scene.
" When the anal craze first began box cover flashes promising "100% Anal" and "All Anal" certainly caught the eye of the browsing consumer"
Didn't catch my eye. Why should it? Are you suggesting that the vast majority of the male population up until that point were walking round harbouring secret, ravenous, primeval desires to ravishes girls assholes? If so, what Darwinian purpose would it serve? Speaking for myself, yes I did fancy taking a few girlfriends up the arse in my youth but then it was only maybe 2-3 times in the course of relationships lasting years. OK, it's nice to try, but once you've done it and got it out of your system there just doesn?t seem too be much point in revisiting it. So when anal movies came along I barley noticed and thought nothing of it. However, I did start to notice when, like some horrible alien weed in a vulnerable eco system, they began to choke the life out of the porno scene. Cropping up everywhere, in ever-grizzlier mutations, sapping the desire, if not turning the stomachs, of a generation of erotica fans.
Don't get me wrong I'm not anti-arse at all. It's just this absurd and ludicrous preponderance of anal sex in almost any current shag video. Just once in the course of a 90 minute feature would be quite sufficient. And as goglostruda suggests - why not try a movie without any anal? After all, you just don't need it if you have sufficiently high calibre attractive ladies in your production.
Dibble ? the voice of reason.
True, you get the impression that some producers would much rather not have to bother trying to sell their product the those pesky punters and would much rather be left alone get on with their hobby - spitting on, slapping, pulling, and reaming girls assholes, any girls.
"It seems the obssession with anal sex lies with the producers and directors"
As I suggested further up the thread.
"not the punters or their 'voice' of sorts, the industry journalists and reviewers."
Most industry sorts are complicit. Most can't see the wood for the trees. Has anyone who makes their living from adult entertainment (apart from the Officer) chimed up here and been unequivocal that the gross overuse of anal in adult erotica is a load of ball-bag?
"Take the case of US porn girl Aurora Snow who appeared on the scene a couple of years ago, refusing to do anal sex or anything much more than standard 1m/1f or 2f scenes. She was pretty much universally acclaimed as the hottest, cutest, sweetest, most natural and girl-next-door girl to have emerged in years. Nine months later when she had sunk to taking two cocks up her ass in every film, everybody lost interest."
I can dig that. I don't find any female porn stars that would take part in extreme ass reaming gonzo the slightest bit appealing either. Quite the opposite. Call me old-fashioned if you will but I prefer my female objects of desire to be coy, pretty and sweet. That's the impression I get from the punters as well. The most popular girls seem to be the pretty/big boobed ones who just flirt with the hardcore scene.
" When the anal craze first began box cover flashes promising "100% Anal" and "All Anal" certainly caught the eye of the browsing consumer"
Didn't catch my eye. Why should it? Are you suggesting that the vast majority of the male population up until that point were walking round harbouring secret, ravenous, primeval desires to ravishes girls assholes? If so, what Darwinian purpose would it serve? Speaking for myself, yes I did fancy taking a few girlfriends up the arse in my youth but then it was only maybe 2-3 times in the course of relationships lasting years. OK, it's nice to try, but once you've done it and got it out of your system there just doesn?t seem too be much point in revisiting it. So when anal movies came along I barley noticed and thought nothing of it. However, I did start to notice when, like some horrible alien weed in a vulnerable eco system, they began to choke the life out of the porno scene. Cropping up everywhere, in ever-grizzlier mutations, sapping the desire, if not turning the stomachs, of a generation of erotica fans.
Don't get me wrong I'm not anti-arse at all. It's just this absurd and ludicrous preponderance of anal sex in almost any current shag video. Just once in the course of a 90 minute feature would be quite sufficient. And as goglostruda suggests - why not try a movie without any anal? After all, you just don't need it if you have sufficiently high calibre attractive ladies in your production.
Dibble ? the voice of reason.