Should we name no shows and timewasters?

[Benson_Media]

..sorry chaps:

http://www.bensonmodels.com/references.html

[one eyed jack]

Nice Simon...But we're talking about the ones that dont show up AND time wasting producers.

No offence but while all the girls have got decent ratings, this is not a reflection on if they decide one day they cant be arsed to leave a producer in the lurch

In other words just because they turn up for you doesnt mean they wont let other producers down orproducers who also cancel without notice or worse still dont bother get in touch at all

[Benson_Media]

one eyed jack wrote:

> Nice Simon...But we're talking about the ones that dont show up
> AND time wasting producers.
>
> No offence but while all the girls have got decent ratings,
> this is not a reflection on if they decide one day they cant be
> arsed to leave a producer in the lurch
>
> In other words just because they turn up for you doesnt mean
> they wont let other producers down orproducers who also cancel
> without notice or worse still dont bother get in touch at all
>
>

But then..what's your point? Everybody is fallible. Except me.

[jaydee]

Hi Simon - what would be even better would be to have live links to the models profile, especially well rated ones, very useful to 'bookers'.

[videokim]

Do a model listing like Glamour finder...if a model/producers don't show etc you give them a bad comment (seen by everyone else just as 'bad comment') , get a couple of bad comments they dock points. The models / producers try to keep their bad comments as little as possible or risk not being hired.

[one eyed jack]

Guys (and girls) rather than debate about it why not just vote yes or no...How it can be dealt with is based on whether we should go for it or not.

This is another one of those things that comes around every now and again and in truth I was against it knowing how it could be exploited to suit certain people being bitchy.

At least this way, models and producers can reply back. How will this not work?!