Testing Rumours

[Sam Slater]

I hope you're not charging me for all these 5 second bursts...

You said you don't know JayK, but you do seem to know a little about his motivations etc....

[quote]Hi Sam

You are correct there is a business relationship between JayK and the Webmaster that has been HIRED to run Michelle B?s site

But the point JayK made was that the Webmaster has no legal authority over Michelle B?s site, he has just been HIRED to run it

The Webmaster is not to blame and JayK stepped in to end the false allegations (based on no facts) that were being levelled at the Webmaster[/quote]

Just admiring him from afar eh? Anyway, whether you're mates or something akin to the belgravia/wayne scenario, it doesn't matter that much outside the fact you've probably a bias attitude when it comes to escorting.

However my points still stand, and are open for sarcasm, abuse or serious debate. That's for the individual to to decide for themselves.

At least I can claim to be at least trying, and if that's something bad, so be it....

[porngirlsxrated]

Sam Slater wrote:

> You said you don't know JayK, but you do seem to know a little
> about his motivations etc....
>
> However my points still stand, and are open for sarcasm, abuse
> or serious debate. That's for the individual to to decide for
> themselves.
>
> At least I can claim to be at least trying, and if that's
> something bad, so be it....
>
>

I work in the industry so I get to hear the facts first hand from other people in the industry and do not have to rely on posts on bulletins boards that may or may not be true. So yes I do know a little about JayK?s (and other people in this industries) motivations

I look forward to reading your further ?serious debate? on this issue, but if you want to make a difference at some point you are going to have to turn your words into actions

Industries are evolved and innovated by doers not by bulletin board debates

[Sam Slater]

[quote]I work in the industry so I get to hear the facts first hand from other people in the industry and do not have to rely on posts on bulletins boards that may or may not be true.[/quote]

So why bother discussing anything here, now?

[quote]if you want to make a difference at some point you are going to have to turn your words into actions[/quote]

What could one man, or even one company do when most of the industry choose to ignore the problems, or convince themselves that there's not a problem at all?

My posts were to point out where I think the industry can improve. I've already said that most will ignore or criticise because of their own motivations. It would take the whole industry to change, like they did with the Darren James case. (3 month testing to 1 month testing overnight).

I know, and you know a lone person, or company cannot make a difference, so your 'dig' at me for not backing up my words with actions is a duff one.

I just pointed out what I think is unfair, unjust and irresponsible. No one will listen for obvious reasons, but my points are there to read and ponder.

Good luck with UKAP, free testing and name & shaming. But they'll make no difference whatsoever really. Who can honestly say there are less outbreaks with 4 week testing, than there were when there was 3 month testing?

You're obviously more comfortable criticising me, than admitting the problem. If young girls' & guys' health weren't the point of this argument, and reaction to me would be laughable.

I guess it's a waste of time carrying this on with you. I'm for reducing STD's, you're not it seems.