shaved or not?

The 'Promotions' forum is for the posting of promotional material relating to the British adult entertainment industry, as well as the seeking and commissioning of work by models and producers working in the British adult entertainment industry.
Officer Dibble
Posts: 2372
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by Officer Dibble »

Looking at those pics side by side it's amazing what a difference a bush makes - in the bush pic you look like a beautiful, sophisticated, wholesome, and indeed fragrant, young woman. But in the shaved one you look like a scrawny, vacuous, yucky (to my mind) young chav bird - YOUNG being the operative word of course.

Anyhow, bush is best. That's what nature intended. That's why NORMAL blokes, who like WOMEN, dig it. Seeing a mature woman, particularly a scrawny woman, with a shaved beaver is somehow repugnant and creepy. It puts me in mind of David Lynch's 'Eraser Head', Clive Baker's 'Hellraiser' or the nightmare works of Hi?ronymus Bosch. I find it yucky on a deeply visceral level.









Of course the CURRENT fashion for shaved beavers was pioneered by the no frills trailer trash adult movie performers who were dragged into the breech when a new breed of chortling, camcorder toting, oafs masquerading as producers, ran out of proper stars during the gonzo movie explosion of the early to mid 90's. This shaved bush trend was then picked up on by mainstream slapper queens' like Pamela Anderson and 'Jordan' - the rest is history. But why would a girl want to ape the dubious style, taste, and mores of a trash queen like Anderson? A type of woman that, in reality, few men fancy, and many men are contemptuous of? Up until that point, and for as long as I can remember, the role models for young women were the beautiful, glamourous, well dressed, immaculately groomed women that most men aspired to. I just can't get my head round how things have changed.



Officer Dibble



[Edited by moderator]
Officer Dibble
Posts: 2372
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by Officer Dibble »

"Definitely not shaved EVER. shaved pussys look like plucked turkeys. tidy bush is best."

Sounds about right, Spanky.




Officer Dibble



Ace
Posts: 5879
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by Ace »

Grow yer bush back Kimberly........more sexier

The West London of my youth is now on dvd


I've met the man on the street............and he's a cunt
planeterotica
Posts: 7093
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by planeterotica »

Go for the full bush Kimberley not just the landing strip let it all grow back, and by the way you are drop dead gorgeous !love!!love!!love!



RogerCockUK
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Bushy!

Post by RogerCockUK »

Hi Kimberly

Keep it fussy down there - different from the usual shaved and I think it looks great on you... Tres sexy!! !wink!

ROGER COCK
(producer /director /editor /pro cameraman /Stud)
Von Boy
Posts: 823
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by Von Boy »

I go for a nice tidy bush...............I think that why i like the glamour shoots from the mid / late 80's (Men Only, Mayfair), top quality photography by Joannie Allum etc. all, to me, made up for great sexy scenes......

Ah well must get on.........

!happy!

Proud to be Von Boy
uncle bob
Posts: 414
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by uncle bob »

I agree with the majority Kim - a nice trim bush suits you.

Hope u r well - gr8 shoot last week
localad
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: shaved or not?

Post by localad »

Ummmmmm well I do liked Shaved ;0) always nice to look at and to eat ! lol
;0)
Andy xxKimberly wrote:
Locked