Mia Phoenix

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by jj »

Feel free to send us some better ones : -)

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Bernie112
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by Bernie112 »

Here is a test of Cathleen Rose main pic rescaled correctly, i.e. by a factor of 3:4 on one axis. Tell me which version you prefer, and I'll do the other ones.

"Original", 8012 bytes:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/actresses/id/16255.jpg[/IMG]
Y-downscaled, 6453 bytes:
[IMG]http://img251.imagevenue.com/loc571/th_ ... _571lo.jpg[/IMG]
X-upscaled, 9303 bytes:
[IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01f ... 2_83lo.jpg[/IMG]
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by jj »

The third pic didn't load on Firefox......

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Bernie112
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by Bernie112 »

Yes, there seems to be a problem. Follow the thumbnail link below instead:
[IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc83/th_87930_16255a_122_83lo.jpg[/IMG]
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by jj »

Thanks.
Option 3 seems too 'flat' to my eye, so Option 2 would seem better.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by jj »

Thanks.
I've played a bit with those and the main issue is your manipulation has
reduced the size of the originals. I prefer images in the 350-380y range for
headshots. Resizing them again necessarily reduces the quality.

I've rescaled the original headshot to 3x:4y and then resized and slightly
cropped:
[IMG]http://img46.imagevenue.com/loc421/th_53099_069227o_123_421lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img252.imagevenue.com/loc251/th_53099_069227_123_251lo.jpg[/IMG]
Any better?

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Bernie112
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by Bernie112 »

Your new version still looks too tall to me, and indeed, if rotated by 25 degrees I can clearly see a slight deformation:
[IMG]http://img138.imagevenue.com/loc128/th_88217_rot_122_128lo.jpg[/IMG]

Scaling Y by a factor 0.95 then rotating gives something about right here:
[IMG]http://img228.imagevenue.com/loc160/th_88218_rot_0.95_122_160lo.jpg[/IMG]

How does it look like on your side?
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by jj »

Bernie112 wrote:
> Your new version still looks too tall to me, and indeed, if
> rotated by 25 degrees I can clearly see a slight deformation:

I can see the difference but to me it's marginal. And if one doesn't rotate it
then there isn't really a problem : -)
I can't keep endlessly fiddling at the edges with these pics when more urgent
things are piling up.....

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Mia Phoenix

Post by jj »

I've split the difference, and replaced the caps with a couple of my 3:4's and
a couple of yours.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Post Reply