Feel free to send us some better ones : -)
Mia Phoenix
Re: Mia Phoenix
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Mia Phoenix
Here is a test of Cathleen Rose main pic rescaled correctly, i.e. by a factor of 3:4 on one axis. Tell me which version you prefer, and I'll do the other ones.
"Original", 8012 bytes:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/actresses/id/16255.jpg[/IMG]
Y-downscaled, 6453 bytes:
[IMG]http://img251.imagevenue.com/loc571/th_ ... _571lo.jpg[/IMG]
X-upscaled, 9303 bytes:
[IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01f ... 2_83lo.jpg[/IMG]
"Original", 8012 bytes:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/actresses/id/16255.jpg[/IMG]
Y-downscaled, 6453 bytes:
[IMG]http://img251.imagevenue.com/loc571/th_ ... _571lo.jpg[/IMG]
X-upscaled, 9303 bytes:
[IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01f ... 2_83lo.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Mia Phoenix
The third pic didn't load on Firefox......
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Mia Phoenix
Yes, there seems to be a problem. Follow the thumbnail link below instead:
[IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc83/th_87930_16255a_122_83lo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc83/th_87930_16255a_122_83lo.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Mia Phoenix
Thanks.
Option 3 seems too 'flat' to my eye, so Option 2 would seem better.
Option 3 seems too 'flat' to my eye, so Option 2 would seem better.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Mia Phoenix
Ok, here are the y-downscaled versions of the "Soloz 8" pics then.
[IMG]http://img278.imagevenue.com/loc46/th_06370_s069227_123_46lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img249.imagevenue.com/loc239/th_06373_s069228_123_239lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img182.imagevenue.com/loc231/th_06374_s069229_123_231lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img257.imagevenue.com/loc247/th_06374_s069230_123_247lo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img201.imagevenue.com/loc481/th_06375_s069231_123_481lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img124.imagevenue.com/loc577/th_06380_s069232_123_577lo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img278.imagevenue.com/loc46/th_06370_s069227_123_46lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img249.imagevenue.com/loc239/th_06373_s069228_123_239lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img182.imagevenue.com/loc231/th_06374_s069229_123_231lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img257.imagevenue.com/loc247/th_06374_s069230_123_247lo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img201.imagevenue.com/loc481/th_06375_s069231_123_481lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img124.imagevenue.com/loc577/th_06380_s069232_123_577lo.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Mia Phoenix
Thanks.
I've played a bit with those and the main issue is your manipulation has
reduced the size of the originals. I prefer images in the 350-380y range for
headshots. Resizing them again necessarily reduces the quality.
I've rescaled the original headshot to 3x:4y and then resized and slightly
cropped:
[IMG]http://img46.imagevenue.com/loc421/th_53099_069227o_123_421lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img252.imagevenue.com/loc251/th_53099_069227_123_251lo.jpg[/IMG]
Any better?
I've played a bit with those and the main issue is your manipulation has
reduced the size of the originals. I prefer images in the 350-380y range for
headshots. Resizing them again necessarily reduces the quality.
I've rescaled the original headshot to 3x:4y and then resized and slightly
cropped:
[IMG]http://img46.imagevenue.com/loc421/th_53099_069227o_123_421lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img252.imagevenue.com/loc251/th_53099_069227_123_251lo.jpg[/IMG]
Any better?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Mia Phoenix
Your new version still looks too tall to me, and indeed, if rotated by 25 degrees I can clearly see a slight deformation:
[IMG]http://img138.imagevenue.com/loc128/th_88217_rot_122_128lo.jpg[/IMG]
Scaling Y by a factor 0.95 then rotating gives something about right here:
[IMG]http://img228.imagevenue.com/loc160/th_88218_rot_0.95_122_160lo.jpg[/IMG]
How does it look like on your side?
[IMG]http://img138.imagevenue.com/loc128/th_88217_rot_122_128lo.jpg[/IMG]
Scaling Y by a factor 0.95 then rotating gives something about right here:
[IMG]http://img228.imagevenue.com/loc160/th_88218_rot_0.95_122_160lo.jpg[/IMG]
How does it look like on your side?
Re: Mia Phoenix
Bernie112 wrote:
> Your new version still looks too tall to me, and indeed, if
> rotated by 25 degrees I can clearly see a slight deformation:
I can see the difference but to me it's marginal. And if one doesn't rotate it
then there isn't really a problem : -)
I can't keep endlessly fiddling at the edges with these pics when more urgent
things are piling up.....
> Your new version still looks too tall to me, and indeed, if
> rotated by 25 degrees I can clearly see a slight deformation:
I can see the difference but to me it's marginal. And if one doesn't rotate it
then there isn't really a problem : -)
I can't keep endlessly fiddling at the edges with these pics when more urgent
things are piling up.....
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Mia Phoenix
I've split the difference, and replaced the caps with a couple of my 3:4's and
a couple of yours.
a couple of yours.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."