Max,
I have found just the party for your vote at the next election.
Vote Green, Max. You know it makes sense.
From the Greens policy booklet:
"?Richer regions do not have the right to use migration controls to protect their privileges from others in the long term,? the party?s policy book states
"A Green Government will ?progressively reduce? border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years
Access to benefits, the right to vote and tax obligations will apply to everyone living on British soil, regardless of passport. The policy book states: ?We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a ?British national? is irrelevant and outdated.?
Merely being a member of al-Qaeda, the IRA and other currently proscribed terrorist groups will no longer be a criminal offence under Green plans
Seems like your kind of political party, Max! !wink!
One for Max
-
Arginald Valleywater
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: One for Max
Scary but nothing 9m hollow point wouldn't cure....
-
max_tranmere
- Posts: 4734
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Davey me old chum...
?Richer regions do not have the right to use migration controls to protect their privileges from others in the long term,? the party?s policy book states"
Doesn't sound like my kind of policy if they're not looking at whether the infrastructure - schools, hospitals, housing stock, etc - can cope. To have a racial mix I am all in favour of, diversity is a good thing, it's all I've ever known, so long as diversity doesn't become domination. Would you, for example, be in favour of black people in Lagos, Nigeria, becoming the minority? I suspect not, a range of cultures is a good thing in a place though. A situation of multi-ethnic is very very different from multi-ideology and multi-allegiance. To import people with a very different outlook on things, and to import people who have no loyalty to this country is something I am against. Having an ethnic mix, and all of those people having total allegiance to Britain, and who follow our way of doing things, I would be in favour of.
"A Green Government will ?progressively reduce? border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years"
Progressively reduce border controls? I wonder if our border controls could be reduced any more than they have been. You can move here from any part of Europe now as easily as move from Kent to Sussex, people from further afield seem to be welcomed with open arms in unlimited numbers too. They can't move here quite as easily as the Europeans but it is not very different. Under Labour the population went up be about 1% per year, the highest immigration for over ONE THOUSAND YEARS. As I said above, if we have the room, the infrastructure can cope, and we create a situation of diversity rather than one of domination (where the natives would end up as the minority in some or many regions) them I'm for it. This is hardly the case in modern Britain. I would not support an amnesty for illegals after five years, or ever. You have broken into a country, lied, most likely fraudulently taken money from the place, and the worst that happens currently is they just pay your travel home. With this policy you would get residency after a set period. No, this should not happen.
"Access to benefits, the right to vote and tax obligations will apply to everyone living on British soil, regardless of passport. The policy book states: ?We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a ?British national? is irrelevant and outdated.?
Access to Benefits for all, I do not support. Would it be right if you or I moved to another country and just lived off the tax-payers hard-earned in that country and contributed nothing? I don't think so. The right to vote for settled people who contribute, follow our way of doing things, and who love this country - that I would be in favour of. People having to pay tax here, regardless of passport, I support - we have that already as far as I'm aware. The concept of the British national being irrelevant and outdated is wrong - and offensive.
"Merely being a member of al-Qaeda, the IRA and other currently proscribed terrorist groups will no longer be a criminal offence under Green plans"
Sounds great - not!
If the Greens are really proposing all this then I would say three things: firstly, they are totally the opposite of a party I would support; second, they are more loony-left than most loony-left organisations; and thirdly they are clearly mad!
Doesn't sound like my kind of policy if they're not looking at whether the infrastructure - schools, hospitals, housing stock, etc - can cope. To have a racial mix I am all in favour of, diversity is a good thing, it's all I've ever known, so long as diversity doesn't become domination. Would you, for example, be in favour of black people in Lagos, Nigeria, becoming the minority? I suspect not, a range of cultures is a good thing in a place though. A situation of multi-ethnic is very very different from multi-ideology and multi-allegiance. To import people with a very different outlook on things, and to import people who have no loyalty to this country is something I am against. Having an ethnic mix, and all of those people having total allegiance to Britain, and who follow our way of doing things, I would be in favour of.
"A Green Government will ?progressively reduce? border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years"
Progressively reduce border controls? I wonder if our border controls could be reduced any more than they have been. You can move here from any part of Europe now as easily as move from Kent to Sussex, people from further afield seem to be welcomed with open arms in unlimited numbers too. They can't move here quite as easily as the Europeans but it is not very different. Under Labour the population went up be about 1% per year, the highest immigration for over ONE THOUSAND YEARS. As I said above, if we have the room, the infrastructure can cope, and we create a situation of diversity rather than one of domination (where the natives would end up as the minority in some or many regions) them I'm for it. This is hardly the case in modern Britain. I would not support an amnesty for illegals after five years, or ever. You have broken into a country, lied, most likely fraudulently taken money from the place, and the worst that happens currently is they just pay your travel home. With this policy you would get residency after a set period. No, this should not happen.
"Access to benefits, the right to vote and tax obligations will apply to everyone living on British soil, regardless of passport. The policy book states: ?We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a ?British national? is irrelevant and outdated.?
Access to Benefits for all, I do not support. Would it be right if you or I moved to another country and just lived off the tax-payers hard-earned in that country and contributed nothing? I don't think so. The right to vote for settled people who contribute, follow our way of doing things, and who love this country - that I would be in favour of. People having to pay tax here, regardless of passport, I support - we have that already as far as I'm aware. The concept of the British national being irrelevant and outdated is wrong - and offensive.
"Merely being a member of al-Qaeda, the IRA and other currently proscribed terrorist groups will no longer be a criminal offence under Green plans"
Sounds great - not!
If the Greens are really proposing all this then I would say three things: firstly, they are totally the opposite of a party I would support; second, they are more loony-left than most loony-left organisations; and thirdly they are clearly mad!
-
David Johnson
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Davey me old chum...
Ok Max. I will take that as a No then!!! !wink!