Rachel Reeves
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Rachel Reeves
I would and also would have no problem in resting my knob between Gloria De Piero's magnificent scones. And worse I always had an odd fancy for Jackie Smith....
Re: Rachel Reeves
A very attractive lady with lovely hair. Take note female porn stars,this is how a class lady should look.
Re: Rachel Reeves
Attractive until she opens her mouth and drones on in that boring snoring voice of hers.
One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind... Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind... Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
Re: Rachel Reeves
Essex Lad wrote:
> Attractive until she opens her mouth and drones on in that
> boring snoring voice of hers.
>
> One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a
> "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind...
> Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
Mensch was a bit of alright for an old bird, rock chic too.
> Attractive until she opens her mouth and drones on in that
> boring snoring voice of hers.
>
> One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a
> "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind...
> Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
Mensch was a bit of alright for an old bird, rock chic too.
We have need of you again, great king.
Re: Rachel Reeves
Old bird? She's 42! Younger than Cathy Barry, Wendy Taylor...
Re: Rachel Reeves
Essex Lad wrote:
> Old bird? She's 42! Younger than Cathy Barry, Wendy Taylor...
Over 23 = old bird!
> Old bird? She's 42! Younger than Cathy Barry, Wendy Taylor...
Over 23 = old bird!
We have need of you again, great king.