Nah, I replied to that and showed where you're going wrong. Nice try, though.
You're the one that passes judgement without trial and I have it in black and white. So.......Rolph guilty then or what?
Seems apt considering Frost's demise: "David - it's over to you."
Rolph Harris
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Rolph Harris
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Rolph Harris
[quote]It's best to comment after any trial as nobody knows what the result of any court case will be.[/quote]
Quite sensible, but don't let David Johnson hear you say that!
Quite sensible, but don't let David Johnson hear you say that!
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Rolph Harris
Glasto? Funny name for a young lad.
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Re: Rolph Harris
Two little boys jokes are wearing a bit thin!sad!
-
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Rolph Harris
I remain deeply sceptical of some of these ancient entertainer/ ancient
cases of child abuse. If one accepts that some it is true (Saville) then I
think also some of it is fake.....Harris was a great entertainer in his heyday,
best of luck to him and I hope his defence is a good one (though the
accusers in all these cases hide behind curtains in court and you can`t even
see their eyes or judge emotions, so much for the fairness of British justice).
Re: Rolf Harris
The Rolf Harris one isn't ancient. Two of the charges refer to last year.