Another bloody parasite

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Cuntybollocks
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Another bloody parasite

Post by Cuntybollocks »



Why am I knocking my pan in running 2 businesses for this to breed like a fucking rabbit.

38 years old!!!. Look at the sate of it!!!
Cuntybollocks
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Another bloody parasite

Post by Cuntybollocks »

*State.
lensman
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Another bloody parasite

Post by lensman »

Those who know the system well use their children as their 'financial shield'.
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Cuntybollocks/Lensman

Post by David Johnson »

So someone who is in a relationship with a bloke gets a mortgage for a house. I assume that her and/or her bloke were working otherwise how did they get a mortgage and live in their own home?

For whatever reason they fall behind with the mortgage and lose their home.

There are no council houses available. Her fault? No, ask Thatcher, Cameron and Labour administrations why this situation has arisen.

So she ends up with ?8K a year being paid by the state direct to a landlord.

So Cuntybollocks/Lensman what is your solution to this situation? SHe has 6 kids 15 years old and under.

Here are some options for you to choose.

1. Her kids get taken into care. She is told she must get a job.

2. The government goes down the Chinese route and states that those families who have more than 2 children, risk imprisonment. That way even if the parents are in work and subsequently lose their jobs there is not such a hit to the state in terms of benefits.

3. The mother must be punished so she is told that the dole will only pay for 2 children even though her children's birth predates this rule. The children go hungry.

4. As in some countries like India, infanticide is not necessarily closely monitored. A similar approach is followed here.

5. Call me Dave and Boy George provide the entire population with prescience so that we all know whether we are going to be unemployed or not.

So which is your preferred option, gentlemen? Or perhaps you have got alternative options which are cost effective e.g. hanging in the town square perhaps?
Essex Lad
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Johno

Post by Essex Lad »

What would YOU do?
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Essex Lad

Post by David Johnson »

!wink! !wink!
Essex Lad
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Essex Lad

Post by Essex Lad »

So you criticise CB and Lensman but you have fuck all ideas to contribute yourself.
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Essex Lad

Post by David Johnson »

!deadhorse! !deadhorse!
Essex Lad
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Essex Lad

Post by Essex Lad »

Utterly, utterly pathetic. I give you the chance to put forward your suggestions and do you have any ideas? Not a one. You just waste your time on puerile emoticons.
Arginald Valleywater
Posts: 4288
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Cuntybollocks/Lensman

Post by Arginald Valleywater »

Simple solution. No more child benefit or child tax credits for more than 2 kids. I was talking to a tenant on Monday and her brood get more in tax credits and child benefit than I get in my wages...

What is sad is how many parents have extra kids to boost their income. No consideration about the child's quality of life, the drain on schools, the NHS etc. Already too many people on earth and retards like these keep banging out kids for money. This isn't a political argument, it's about being a responsible citizen and having the amount of kids you can afford, not your hard working tax payer.
Locked