Rarely bought the 'newspaper' but it's looking like the feminista's may get their way on the only thing I think most get the rag for.
@Kazipooh is the good lady who contacted Murdoch now being seen as a hero to sum & complete fukwit to others.
No more page 3
Re: No more page 3
Anyone who bought it for the "Tits" is a moron. There is no requirement for such tame stuff anymore. Page 3 is a complete waste of space and editing effort.
RoddersUK
Re: No more page 3
"but it's looking like the feminista's may get their way on the only thing I think most get the rag for"
If it's the death-knell for the (toilet) paper that can only be a good thing.
If it's the death-knell for the (toilet) paper that can only be a good thing.
Re: No more page 3
It had its day a long time ago, tradition is the only thing keeping it going. Who can name a page 3 girl these days? You used to be able to reel off a list, now, I can't think of one.
We have need of you again, great king.
Re: No more page 3
RoddersUK wrote:
> Anyone who bought it for the "Tits" is a moron.
Sorry I forgot some of you do actually buy it for the news !laugh!
I am with spider if it does mean the end of the paper it can only be a good thing.
Guessing there does have to be some concern about who the next target will be after this success but with all the free stuff about why give a fuck.
> Anyone who bought it for the "Tits" is a moron.
Sorry I forgot some of you do actually buy it for the news !laugh!
I am with spider if it does mean the end of the paper it can only be a good thing.
Guessing there does have to be some concern about who the next target will be after this success but with all the free stuff about why give a fuck.
Re: No more page 3
On a thread about tits there appears to be a couple of them looking to trade insults !laugh!
!oops! !sheep!
!oops! !sheep!
-
one eyed jack
- Posts: 12410
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: No more page 3
Any one who bought the paper is a FUCKING MORON
Whoa i wouldnt go so far as to be as offensive as that. A lot of people bought that newspaper and Im sure it wasnt just for tits. It was a simple and clean read that appealed to right wingers (so Im surprised to read comments that I have o here against it) unlike some of the other bulkier papers you had to wrestle with. It was cheap. it was titilating and full of sensationalism. It was the Jeremy Kyle of newspapers
It didnt become the "nations" favourite by chance.
That said there really wasnt much to it at all either.
The internet has all but decimated everything. We are in the midst of change and frankly there is no place for The Sun newspaper as it was
Whoa i wouldnt go so far as to be as offensive as that. A lot of people bought that newspaper and Im sure it wasnt just for tits. It was a simple and clean read that appealed to right wingers (so Im surprised to read comments that I have o here against it) unlike some of the other bulkier papers you had to wrestle with. It was cheap. it was titilating and full of sensationalism. It was the Jeremy Kyle of newspapers
It didnt become the "nations" favourite by chance.
That said there really wasnt much to it at all either.
The internet has all but decimated everything. We are in the midst of change and frankly there is no place for The Sun newspaper as it was
www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
Re: No more page 3
2nfro wrote:
> Any one who bought the paper is a FUCKING MORON .
>
[img]http://scarletstandard.files.wordpress. ... 96450a.jpg[/img]
> Any one who bought the paper is a FUCKING MORON .
>
[img]http://scarletstandard.files.wordpress. ... 96450a.jpg[/img]
We have need of you again, great king.
Re: No more page 3
I'm sure as an MP he won't have bought it, he will have claimed for it on expenses.