Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
derrick76
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

How many West Indian cricketers

Post by derrick76 »

have you ever heard racially abuse a white player?
derrick76
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

So from what I'm reading

Post by derrick76 »

...the black lawyers (or whomever are the reps) are cunts and bastards etc etc.

And that black (and other) players should put up with racial abuse since they get paid plenty money. Ok, so only poor blacks (and others) should be able to complain about racial abuse.

Got it.

Personally, I'd prefer to shoot a racist dead in the face with sawed off, or apply my cutlass across his neck, but I've got to do things the civilised way....so can't be doing that. Flashbacks to that movie A Rage in Harlem: "You picked the wrong n*** to call a n***!"

Even stepping in his face may result in me getting thrown in jail and him singing like a canary so as to have the maximum thrown at me. So what's left.
Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

Post by Flat_Eric »

Like I said Derrick, I could take being called a "white cunt" for 100 grand a week. Come to think of it, I've been called FAR worse things in my time for a LOT less !laugh!.

But sticks & stones and all that. Anyway why is being called a "black bastard" any worse than being called a "fat cunt" or a "ginger twat"?

Are you of the "black people can't be racist" school?

- Eric

Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: So from what I'm reading

Post by Flat_Eric »

derrick76 wrote:

> Personally, I'd prefer to shoot a racist dead in the face with
> sawed off, or apply my cutlass across his neck


How very liberal-minded of you! A very "progressive" attitude I must say!
- Eric

Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

Post by Flat_Eric »

You'll be demanding the death penalty be restored for murderers next !laugh! !laugh!

- Eric

Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

Post by Sam Slater »

[quote]But sticks & stones and all that. Anyway why is being called a "black bastard" any worse than being called a "fat cunt" or a "ginger twat"?[/quote]

Because we don't have a historical culture of 'fat cunt lynchings' and 'ginger slaves'?

Fuck's sake......

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Arginald Valleywater
Posts: 4288
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: How many West Indian cricketers

Post by Arginald Valleywater »

Stacks mate. Sledging is brutal. Ask Glen McGrath who was getting stuff about his late wife from opposing players. Remember Honky means Pig, it is not a compliment.
Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

Post by Flat_Eric »

>>


Ah, ok. It's a "historical guilt" thing.

I'll go and don me hair shirt then ....

- Eric

Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

Post by Flat_Eric »

Sam Slater wrote:

> Because we don't have a historical culture of 'fat cunt
> lynchings' and 'ginger slaves'?


The point is Sam that these utterances are probably no less "offensive" to you if you're fat or ginger.

Or (God forbid) fat AND ginger.

- Eric
Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Now the FA is "institutionally racist"?!

Post by Flat_Eric »

Not to mention that black people have quite a colourful history of enslaving and lynching each other as well, and that it's still ongoing in some corners of Africa.
Locked