Right wingers - are they mad?
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
er........?
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
Ken Shabby wrote:
> Everybody, please try and be tolerant of other peoples
> opinions. Things are only exacerbated when you try to
> marginalize others with different beliefs.
Yes and calling someone a cunt because they disagree with you serves no purpose and isn't likely to get them to revise their opinions.
> Everybody, please try and be tolerant of other peoples
> opinions. Things are only exacerbated when you try to
> marginalize others with different beliefs.
Yes and calling someone a cunt because they disagree with you serves no purpose and isn't likely to get them to revise their opinions.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
Oh, was that aimed at me? If it was, then I'm sorry for the late reply. I just read: 'er........?' and saw a link. The penny has only just dropped.
If it was, then I'll say that I don't think that anything I've said in this thread contradicts any of my comments in the other (or vice-versa).
I wasn't suggesting that it's wrong to disagree or to make your point. I was just recommending doing so without labelling others as stupid just because they disagree with you.
And I haven't ever called anyone a cunt. (not on these boards, anyway). And the 'smug bastard' comment was aimed at people on TV, not anyone on here. I did call Sam Slater an asshole, but only because he called me thick....
If it was, then I'll say that I don't think that anything I've said in this thread contradicts any of my comments in the other (or vice-versa).
I wasn't suggesting that it's wrong to disagree or to make your point. I was just recommending doing so without labelling others as stupid just because they disagree with you.
And I haven't ever called anyone a cunt. (not on these boards, anyway). And the 'smug bastard' comment was aimed at people on TV, not anyone on here. I did call Sam Slater an asshole, but only because he called me thick....
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
I didn't call you thick, I implied it. You called me an asshole THEN I called you thick.
And anyway, you stared it by implying I was a smug bastard. It was actually Atheists on telly you called smug but since I agree with most of them it was an implication by proxy...........sort of !happy!
And anyway, you stared it by implying I was a smug bastard. It was actually Atheists on telly you called smug but since I agree with most of them it was an implication by proxy...........sort of !happy!
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
Why don't you split some hairs while you're at it?
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
I was upset that you tried to make out you only called me a nasty name because I called you a nasty name first. That misrepresented me unfairly. Surely as a man who shuns the cold and calculating in life you'd be the type who empathises with my emotional distress.
I could hardly sleep last night. And on the Jubilee weekend as well!
I could hardly sleep last night. And on the Jubilee weekend as well!
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
Why don't we just agree to disagree?
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
Ohalrighthen.
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Re: Right wingers - are they mad?
andy at handiwork wrote:
> Melanie Phillips certainly is for a start.
Didn't appear in the least bit mad on Question Time last night.
> Melanie Phillips certainly is for a start.
Didn't appear in the least bit mad on Question Time last night.