Easy 11 Grand Girls!

[eroticartist]

PJ,

I absolutely agree and even a judge would agree too. See: of course he was criticised for saying what he thought by the feminist groups and the New Labour ilk.
Mike Freeman.

[eroticartist]

Sam Slater,
Why should I debate with an ignorant fool who admits that he has not even bothered to read my Criteria of Rape and furthermore I think that you are a liar as well because you read everything that I write in order to find points on which you can attack me and when you read my essay criticising the way the present rape law works you could not find any fault with it .
Mike Freeman

[eroticartist]

Alice, I have covered all these points in my essay A Criteria of Rape. Any more stupid and frivolous questions from you will be ignored.
Mike Freeman.

[eroticartist]

They are your words and not mine and a stupid comment from someone who wants to argue about what I believe but admits that he does not read what I have said in my essay A Criteria of Rape. I think that you have read it!
Mike Freeman.

[eroticartist]

I think that rape is a crime of violence and the law on assault per se is adequate to deal with any crimes of violence against women.
Mike Freeman

[Sam Slater]

Mike,

When I say something, I mean it. I don't come to the bgafd to waste time lying to paranoid fantasists.

I asked you two questions and if you don't want to answer them, then don't!

[Trumpton]

eroticartist wrote:

> A Criteria of Rape.
> By Mike Freeman.


This "criteria" is of your own making - it's not the law as on the statue.

[Sam Slater]

You think wrong??which is par for the course when it comes to you.

[Jacques]

It's a crime of intent not fucking violence anybody can discover this for themselves by a little research and some case law but oh no not Mike with the tin foil round his head!!!

All your "essay" does is ramble on and trivialise a very serious criminal offence.

Your comment, and I quote "The answer is to scrap all sexual crimes and judge men on the amount of violence they commit against a woman." is unbelievable. By that criteria grooming a prepubescent child is a lesser crime. No violence there is there Mike? But there is intent. So how are you going to criminalise intent? And what about gay rape?

You are not on the same planet in fact you are nuttier than squirrel shit.